1.7 sec in total
200 ms
1.3 sec
199 ms
Click here to check amazing Lexmark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lexmark.bg
Lexmark създава иновативни технологии и решения за работа с изображения, които помагат на потребителите по целия свят да отпечатват, защитават и управляват информацията с лекота, ефективност и ненадми...
Visit lexmark.bgWe analyzed Lexmark.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lexmark.bg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
200 ms
25 ms
233 ms
10 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lexmark.bg, 74% (39 requests) were made to Lexmark.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (408 ms) relates to the external source Lexmark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (74%)
1.8 MB
454.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Lexmark.bg main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lexmark needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 692.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 692.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 550.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lexmark.bg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 550.0 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (73%)
44
12
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lexmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lexmark.bg
200 ms
25 ms
bg_bg.html
233 ms
clientlibs.min.css
10 ms
jquery.min.js
14 ms
utils.min.js
10 ms
granite.min.js
9 ms
jquery.min.js
10 ms
clientlibs.min.js
31 ms
satelliteLib-73facede7bc51e73160930494286ce4ba258a138.js
65 ms
lxk-framework.css
26 ms
pagination.css
28 ms
utilities.css
29 ms
require.js
27 ms
main.js
28 ms
jwplayer.js
29 ms
header-footer.css
44 ms
mbox.js
43 ms
shared.min.js
43 ms
underscore.min.js
44 ms
kernel.min.js
44 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
target.js
23 ms
standard
19 ms
tracker.js
17 ms
modernizr-2.6.3.js
16 ms
jquery-private.js
16 ms
collect
133 ms
lxk-logo-2x.png
106 ms
satellite-56ab961164746d0a7c001726.js
94 ms
satellite-55e891e36466340017000e55.js
92 ms
s-code-contents-dea945c1d332ada2f6d65951bf6980fe95c50e1a.js
92 ms
sprite-ui-icon-lib.png
87 ms
sprite-national-flags-icon-lib-12.png
86 ms
1453234725906.jpg
87 ms
lxk-symbol-2x.png
86 ms
s_code.js
408 ms
tracker-presets.js
400 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
400 ms
px
396 ms
header-footer.js
387 ms
search.js
387 ms
tphero-regular-webfont.woff
388 ms
tphero-light-webfont.woff
389 ms
tphero-medium-webfont.woff
391 ms
tphero-semibold-webfont.woff
391 ms
tphero-bold-webfont.woff
388 ms
lxk-ui.woff
389 ms
elqCfg.min.js
71 ms
u.php
137 ms
sc-map.js
34 ms
svrGP
59 ms
s51381648392416
40 ms
lexmark.bg accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
lexmark.bg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lexmark.bg SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
BG
BG
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lexmark.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Bulgarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lexmark.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lexmark.bg
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lexmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: