6.1 sec in total
301 ms
5.1 sec
747 ms
Welcome to lifeliqe.com homepage info - get ready to check Lifeliqe best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lifeliqe.com
We make virtual reality in education and training more effective with lifelike immersive simulations. Explore Lifeliqe!
Visit lifeliqe.comWe analyzed Lifeliqe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 301 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
lifeliqe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value4.6 s
36/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value10,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.108
87/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
301 ms
2605 ms
23 ms
160 ms
230 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeliqe.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Web-sdk.smartlook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifeliqe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 201.3 kB (26%)
767.7 kB
566.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifeliqe.com main page is 767.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 395.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 147.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeliqe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeliqe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (61%)
41
16
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeliqe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifeliqe.com
301 ms
www.lifeliqe.com
2605 ms
recorder.js
23 ms
bootstrap.min.css
160 ms
321style.css
230 ms
menu-321style.css
304 ms
custom.css
341 ms
state-level-workforce-partners-114-333-1.svg
326 ms
cte-114-333-2.svg
324 ms
k-12-education-114-333-3.svg
322 ms
community-colleges-114-333-4.svg
428 ms
libraries-114-333-5.svg
429 ms
enterprise-114-333-6.svg
433 ms
custom-solutions-114-333-7.svg
431 ms
jquery.min.js
440 ms
popper.min.js
66 ms
bootstrap.min.js
75 ms
jquery.cookie.js
394 ms
mixitup.min.js
439 ms
mixitup-multifilter.min.js
395 ms
tiny-slider.min.css
73 ms
tiny-slider.min.js
100 ms
css2
121 ms
all.min.css
544 ms
animate.min.css
89 ms
wow.min.js
88 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
98 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
428 ms
modernizr.min.js
427 ms
svg-injector.min.js
517 ms
bootbox.all.min.js
519 ms
minilazyload.min.js
96 ms
script-all.js
519 ms
ekko-lightbox.min.css
517 ms
ekko-lightbox.min.js
519 ms
cookie-consent.js
646 ms
js
118 ms
lifeliqe-dialysis-patient.jpg
512 ms
lifeliqe-certified-nursing-assistant.jpg
511 ms
lifeliqe-mt-1.jpg
509 ms
lifeliqe-hvac-technician.jpg
510 ms
lifeliqe-software-developer.jpg
509 ms
lifeliqe-custom-development.jpeg
509 ms
microsoft-partner.png
577 ms
Archia-Bold.otf
501 ms
Archia-Regular.otf
498 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
229 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
97 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
99 ms
fa-light-300.woff
98 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
201 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
334 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
554 ms
fa-light-300.ttf
473 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
289 ms
lifeliqe.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifeliqe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lifeliqe.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
CS
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeliqe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Czech language. Our system also found out that Lifeliqe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeliqe.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifeliqe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: