2.4 sec in total
418 ms
1.4 sec
655 ms
Welcome to lifelogger.com homepage info - get ready to check Lifelogger best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lifelogger.com
Capture, live stream, share, and store your memories safely and securely forever on the cloud with LifeLogger.
Visit lifelogger.comWe analyzed Lifelogger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 418 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
lifelogger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
418 ms
127 ms
24 ms
36 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Lifelogger.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (418 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifelogger.com.
Page size can be reduced by 728.8 kB (52%)
1.4 MB
682.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifelogger.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 572.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifelogger needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 408.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 408.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifelogger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 221.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (70%)
56
17
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifelogger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifelogger.com
418 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
127 ms
css
24 ms
css
36 ms
css
47 ms
motioncss.css
163 ms
motioncss-responsive.css
85 ms
font-awesome.css
126 ms
magnific-popup.css
86 ms
slick.css
104 ms
style.css
284 ms
responsive.css
128 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
144 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
171 ms
us_grata_custom_styles.css
168 ms
modernizr.js
171 ms
jquery.js
265 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
203 ms
js
52 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
152 ms
jquery.isotope.js
191 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
153 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
187 ms
slick.min.js
337 ms
jquery.parallax.js
196 ms
jquery.horparallax.js
336 ms
waypoints.min.js
336 ms
imagesloaded.js
336 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
339 ms
us.widgets.js
337 ms
responsive.js
336 ms
plugins.js
337 ms
comment-reply.min.js
337 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
337 ms
wp-embed.min.js
338 ms
logooo.png
243 ms
canstockphoto31279612_900x600.jpg
270 ms
LL-CamModule3.jpeg
57 ms
LL-CamModule1.jpeg
59 ms
logo_200x200.png
242 ms
untitled_6_of_11-e1417448654242.jpg
78 ms
Resized-PUVWZ.jpg
241 ms
20141013-03_360-e1447967118510.jpg
241 ms
Filip_Jelev_new.jpg
267 ms
Atanas_Rogachev_new.jpg
268 ms
Gospodin_Gyurov_new.jpg
329 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
282 ms
apply.js
192 ms
iStock_000027095061_500x274.jpg
212 ms
analytics.js
173 ms
atrk.js
198 ms
1762653.js
170 ms
apply-impl-1.0.min.js
80 ms
apply-referrer.min.css
58 ms
visit
101 ms
collect
65 ms
atrk.gif
148 ms
test.png
314 ms
collect
56 ms
lifelogger.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
lifelogger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lifelogger.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifelogger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifelogger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifelogger.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifelogger. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: