1.1 sec in total
75 ms
902 ms
112 ms
Welcome to lifemarketing.us homepage info - get ready to check Life Marketing best content right away, or after learning these important things about lifemarketing.us
Like Marketing is a full Service digital advertising and media company, servicing every type of privately and publicly held business.
Visit lifemarketing.usWe analyzed Lifemarketing.us page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
lifemarketing.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
75 ms
62 ms
79 ms
71 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lifemarketing.us, 72% (28 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (415 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (76%)
2.6 MB
613.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifemarketing.us main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifemarketing.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (73%)
37
10
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Marketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifemarketing.us
75 ms
www.lifemarketing.us
62 ms
bt
79 ms
require.min.js
71 ms
main-r.min.js
81 ms
viewer.css
116 ms
ugc-viewer
37 ms
dynamicmodel
7 ms
2c6eb6_c926891cd5db00439b8b69cbf2bd67bd_241.json.z
415 ms
2c6eb6_80582a0f33fbc1655ae5f0eb089df64c_242.json.z
372 ms
bt
70 ms
skins.min.js
97 ms
components.min.js
95 ms
utils.min.js
64 ms
core.min.js
92 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
92 ms
lodash.min.js
91 ms
TweenMax.min.js
92 ms
layout.min.js
92 ms
tpa.min.js
94 ms
fonts.min.js
92 ms
animations.min.js
93 ms
swfobject.min.js
92 ms
mousetrap.min.js
93 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
92 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
93 ms
react-dom.min.js
258 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
259 ms
widgets.min.js
256 ms
experiment.js
257 ms
render.min.js
257 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
257 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
256 ms
zepto.min.js
257 ms
color.min.js
256 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
94 ms
bt
82 ms
bt
43 ms
dc.js
27 ms
lifemarketing.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lifemarketing.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lifemarketing.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifemarketing.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lifemarketing.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifemarketing.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life Marketing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: