7.4 sec in total
1.3 sec
5.2 sec
791 ms
Visit lifeone.me now to see the best up-to-date Lifeone content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeone.me
生活堂の設置工事事例集を自社工事スタッフがご紹介します。
Visit lifeone.meWe analyzed Lifeone.me page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
lifeone.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.151
76/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
1342 ms
684 ms
353 ms
355 ms
365 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeone.me, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifeone.me.
Page size can be reduced by 99.1 kB (15%)
666.8 kB
567.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifeone.me main page is 666.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 561.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeone images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeone.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)
57
31
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
1342 ms
style.css
684 ms
pagenavi-css.css
353 ms
kanren.js
355 ms
ga.js
365 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
blog_bg05.gif
179 ms
blog_bg01.gif
1231 ms
logo.jpg
173 ms
blog_title01.gif
184 ms
blog_img02.gif
179 ms
blog_img01.gif
343 ms
blog_icon08.jpg
355 ms
blog_icon05.jpg
356 ms
blog_icon06.jpg
357 ms
blog_icon17.jpg
365 ms
blog_icon20.jpg
513 ms
blog_icon13.jpg
530 ms
blog_icon01.jpg
534 ms
blog_icon02.jpg
532 ms
blog_icon03.jpg
547 ms
blog_icon12.jpg
682 ms
blog_icon11.jpg
709 ms
blog_icon04.jpg
709 ms
blog_icon07.jpg
711 ms
blog_icon18.jpg
728 ms
blog_icon09.jpg
853 ms
blog_icon10.jpg
884 ms
blog_icon14.jpg
884 ms
blog_icon15.jpg
884 ms
blog_icon16.jpg
909 ms
blog_icon19.jpg
1022 ms
blog_bg04.png
1059 ms
blog_bg02.png
1061 ms
blog_img06.png
1234 ms
blog_bg03.png
1090 ms
blog_img03.gif
1193 ms
11115.jpg
1862 ms
222224.jpg
1749 ms
111113.jpg
1844 ms
222223.jpg
1517 ms
11114.jpg
2224 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
63 ms
22223.jpg
1535 ms
11113.jpg
1629 ms
222222.jpg
1891 ms
1458279194998s.jpg
1893 ms
1458280797473s.jpg
1768 ms
CIMG0004.jpg
1819 ms
CIMG0005.jpg
1984 ms
CIMG0002.jpg
2043 ms
CIMG0003.jpg
2024 ms
s-IMG_4695.jpg
1899 ms
s-IMG_4697.jpg
1972 ms
s-IMG_4684.jpg
2564 ms
s-IMG_4685.jpg
2117 ms
99878c5b0280159eb8e729463d204d3c.jpg
2137 ms
eb278ed9f8f83f66724bb798ae66978e.jpg
1999 ms
lifeone.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
lifeone.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lifeone.me SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeone.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeone.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeone.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifeone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: