Tools & Wizards About Us
lifescc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

lifescc.com

Best Slimming Centres & Weight Loss Clinics in Hyderabad - Lifescc

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

58 ms

Resources Loaded

921 ms

Page Rendered

938 ms

lifescc.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lifescc.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifescc content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifescc.com

Lifescc is a chain of weightloss clinics & slimming centres in Hyderabad. We provide safe and nonsurgical weightloss treatments with cutting-edge technology.

Visit lifescc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifescc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifescc.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifescc.com

58 ms

www.lifescc.com

30 ms

www.lifescc.com

69 ms

css

108 ms

bootstrap.min.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Lifescc.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (517 ms) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifescc.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 58.0 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifescc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 812.4 kB
  • After minification 812.4 kB
  • After compression 796.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 114.2 kB
  • After minification 114.2 kB
  • After compression 112.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifescc.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (56%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifescc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifescc.com

lifescc.com

58 ms

www.lifescc.com

www.lifescc.com

30 ms

www.lifescc.com

www.lifescc.com

69 ms

css

css

108 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

40 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

60 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

61 ms

xs-icon.css

xs-icon.css

64 ms

themeSwither.css

themeSwither.css

63 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

59 ms

isotope.css

isotope.css

65 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

68 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

74 ms

style.css

style.css

91 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

70 ms

bmi-style.css

bmi-style.css

66 ms

lib.css

lib.css

82 ms

js

js

217 ms

js

js

377 ms

js

js

401 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

71 ms

jquery.form-validator.min.js

jquery.form-validator.min.js

100 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

69 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

77 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

106 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

216 ms

lifesccchatbot.js

lifesccchatbot.js

188 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

85 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

211 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

74 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

76 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

93 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

95 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

185 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

186 ms

appear.js

appear.js

95 ms

spectragram.min.js

spectragram.min.js

95 ms

themeSwither.js

themeSwither.js

100 ms

main.js

main.js

100 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

183 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

210 ms

bmi-script.js

bmi-script.js

210 ms

css

css

43 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

282 ms

hotjar-1075554.js

hotjar-1075554.js

517 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

357 ms

main-logo1.png

main-logo1.png

214 ms

mainslide2.jpg

mainslide2.jpg

290 ms

slider-3_img_3.jpg

slider-3_img_3.jpg

280 ms

banner.png

banner.png

282 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

213 ms

section-heading-separetor.png

section-heading-separetor.png

214 ms

cools1.jpeg

cools1.jpeg

280 ms

ph.png

ph.png

217 ms

em.png

em.png

217 ms

t3.png

t3.png

283 ms

loss.jpg

loss.jpg

290 ms

t6.png

t6.png

290 ms

t4.jpg

t4.jpg

289 ms

t1.png

t1.png

290 ms

slide_bg.jpg

slide_bg.jpg

345 ms

fat.png

fat.png

291 ms

arm.png

arm.png

291 ms

body.png

body.png

292 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

293 ms

home3.jpg

home3.jpg

291 ms

home2.jpg

home2.jpg

382 ms

home1.jpg

home1.jpg

383 ms

home4.jpg

home4.jpg

383 ms

scul1.jpg

scul1.jpg

350 ms

scul2.jpg

scul2.jpg

382 ms

scul3.jpg

scul3.jpg

436 ms

scul4.jpg

scul4.jpg

440 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

441 ms

before-after-1.jpg

before-after-1.jpg

439 ms

before-after-2.jpg

before-after-2.jpg

438 ms

quote-icon.png

quote-icon.png

438 ms

t2.jpg

t2.jpg

438 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

188 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

264 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

301 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

326 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

411 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

413 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

419 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

412 ms

t3.jpg

t3.jpg

418 ms

consult.png

consult.png

419 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

262 ms

iconfont8541.ttf

iconfont8541.ttf

262 ms

landbot-3.0.0.js

landbot-3.0.0.js

394 ms

monolog.js

monolog.js

90 ms

monolog.css

monolog.css

165 ms

modules.349061f2d87d84c4c336.js

modules.349061f2d87d84c4c336.js

20 ms

Accessibility Review

lifescc.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifescc.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

lifescc.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifescc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifescc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifescc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifescc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: