6.7 sec in total
2.2 sec
4.4 sec
171 ms
Welcome to lifesignpost.com homepage info - get ready to check Lifesignpost best content right away, or after learning these important things about lifesignpost.com
Visit lifesignpost.comWe analyzed Lifesignpost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lifesignpost.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
2179 ms
187 ms
473 ms
204 ms
292 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesignpost.com, 26% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifesignpost.com.
Page size can be reduced by 158.5 kB (55%)
287.2 kB
128.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifesignpost.com main page is 287.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 146.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifesignpost images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 97.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesignpost.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)
37
14
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifesignpost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lifesignpost.com
2179 ms
styles.css
187 ms
jquery.js
473 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
204 ms
DD_roundies.js
292 ms
mctagmap.css
208 ms
all.js
5 ms
jquery.form.min.js
104 ms
scripts.js
107 ms
mctagmap.js
126 ms
comment-gray.png
103 ms
rss-gray.png
102 ms
inputbackgr.gif
100 ms
apiline1000.JPG
107 ms
feedicon.png
98 ms
emailicon.png
102 ms
magnifier2-gray.gif
193 ms
comment-gray.gif
209 ms
folder-gray.gif
212 ms
snowvalley-127x150.jpg
211 ms
LigurianDog50x50.jpg
222 ms
LSP50X50.png
217 ms
oliveknitting50x50.jpg
307 ms
109 ms
xd_arbiter.php
39 ms
xd_arbiter.php
44 ms
like_box.php
96 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
31 ms
udqjbTyb5Ue.css
24 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
32 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
31 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
28 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
28 ms
205855_179211845484787_1259697_n.jpg
35 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
7 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
4 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
2 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
4 ms
lifesignpost.com accessibility score
lifesignpost.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
lifesignpost.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesignpost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifesignpost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifesignpost.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifesignpost. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: