Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

lifestory.film

LifeStory.Film | A Wedding Storyteller | Photo & Video

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

350 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

653 ms

lifestory.film screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lifestory.film homepage info - get ready to check Life Story best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lifestory.film

At LifeStory.Film we not only capture your big day but tell a story that has lead to it. Check samples of our work for inspiration, and get in touch today!

Visit lifestory.film

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifestory.film page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifestory.film performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifestory.film

350 ms

contactus.min.css

274 ms

generated-desktop.css

241 ms

all.css

245 ms

helper-parts.min.css

239 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Lifestory.film, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifestory.film.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Lifestory.film main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 110.7 kB

  • Original 136.4 kB
  • After minification 136.4 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Story images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (61%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Story. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifestory.film accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lifestory.film best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lifestory.film SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifestory.film can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifestory.film main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life Story. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: