6.1 sec in total
188 ms
4.9 sec
1 sec
Welcome to lifeteam.net homepage info - get ready to check Lifeteam best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lifeteam.net
Visit lifeteam.netWe analyzed Lifeteam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 188 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
lifeteam.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.3 s
0/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
Value2,290 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.291
41/100
15%
Value20.5 s
2/100
10%
188 ms
101 ms
146 ms
22 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeteam.net, 28% (18 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 20% (13 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifeteam.net.
Page size can be reduced by 276.4 kB (2%)
14.2 MB
13.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifeteam.net main page is 14.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeteam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeteam.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (46%)
63
34
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeteam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifeteam.net
188 ms
reset.css
101 ms
screen.css
146 ms
jsapi
22 ms
jquery.cross-slide.min.js
101 ms
js
20 ms
maps.google.circleoverlay.js
99 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
print.css
103 ms
gtm.js
79 ms
body_bg.jpg
67 ms
home_logo.jpg
105 ms
nav_bg.jpg
66 ms
Field%20shot%20good%20for%20web.jpg
2971 ms
YY5Q9810%20copy.jpg
288 ms
Night%20Bird.jpg
345 ms
Group%20Shot%20Good%20for%20Web.jpg
1981 ms
membership_bucket.jpg
113 ms
testimonial_bucket.jpg
145 ms
Ad2_MockupImage_1.4WEB.jpg
1816 ms
story_bucket.jpg
205 ms
camts_lg.jpg
246 ms
getgear.jpg
296 ms
aelbag.jpg
340 ms
aelredhat.jpg
346 ms
AElshirt.jpg
390 ms
likebox.php
190 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
st.js
10 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
33 ms
C-D3sjGKj3j.css
284 ms
zEMlMNmIXUJ.css
353 ms
Czh0gDTFcBt.css
424 ms
qLqE56HO-SR.css
551 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
624 ms
b94UUzHjapV.js
622 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
494 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
491 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
493 ms
b_6HNn_J2BZ.js
559 ms
6kb4qPGfoPa.js
673 ms
ezSeJz80WmZ.js
759 ms
10929252_903314939686721_8836146689351589100_n.jpg
290 ms
542137_388774687807418_80346699_n.jpg
350 ms
11169221_1243869635628459_2485062393687449144_n.jpg
422 ms
12088492_1636324553310592_171665671493073319_n.jpg
494 ms
12795496_1057806880938736_7721243142123392956_n.jpg
492 ms
12592772_761239234011272_5897869087564888549_n.jpg
489 ms
1621727_1671291136468810_195445860658116795_n.jpg
673 ms
521825_569019243125820_1593752128_n.jpg
490 ms
12802837_1118736924811187_1076255621068347599_n.jpg
492 ms
12802935_1116445675040312_1060140826883146736_n.jpg
557 ms
12801291_1116445508373662_4980752164574560153_n.jpg
622 ms
12801379_1116445338373679_5794025054444342128_n.jpg
559 ms
12798907_1116435168374696_9137366591420038671_n.jpg
559 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
68 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
70 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
72 ms
sOQnlBB68lt.png
70 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
71 ms
f6T91Deal_q.js
137 ms
Group%20Shot%20Good%20for%20Web.jpg
1543 ms
banner_btn_bg.jpg
51 ms
lifeteam.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifeteam.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lifeteam.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeteam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeteam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeteam.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifeteam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: