5.2 sec in total
937 ms
3.9 sec
404 ms
Visit lifevision.se now to see the best up-to-date Lifevision content for Sweden and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifevision.se
Visit lifevision.seWe analyzed Lifevision.se page load time and found that the first response time was 937 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lifevision.se performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value16.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.5 s
1/100
10%
Value1,730 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.264
47/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
937 ms
2157 ms
208 ms
213 ms
314 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Lifevision.se, 6% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifevision.se.
Page size can be reduced by 599.9 kB (32%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifevision.se main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifevision images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 395.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 395.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifevision.se needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (42%)
59
34
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifevision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifevision.se
937 ms
www.lifevision.se
2157 ms
base.css
208 ms
grid.css
213 ms
style.css
314 ms
pagenavi-css.css
227 ms
stt.min.css
232 ms
buttons.js
7 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
115 ms
ga.js
11 ms
gb.gif
115 ms
top_logo.png
114 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
22 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
22 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
jquery.bxSlider.js
230 ms
banner_framat_20april.jpg
670 ms
karins_bocker_775x436.jpg
684 ms
signature.png
124 ms
comment-reply.min.js
113 ms
follow_twitter.png
106 ms
follow_rss.png
249 ms
follow_facebook.png
252 ms
follow_youtube.png
253 ms
follow_vimeo.png
252 ms
Karins_bocker_460x1962.jpg
545 ms
karin-ad1.jpg
430 ms
LV-shop3.jpg
544 ms
bottom_logo.png
374 ms
stortavla_bg.jpg
415 ms
mainquote_bg.png
520 ms
rarr_large.png
449 ms
twitter_bar_bg.png
456 ms
main_content_bg_noline.png
458 ms
rarr.png
526 ms
stortavla_bg.png
655 ms
bottom_twitter.png
561 ms
bottom_facebook.png
578 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
110 ms
pager.png
466 ms
pager-active.png
507 ms
38249687
67 ms
ISUraQdBYMI3VoDzBxXqNvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
11 ms
player.js
148 ms
player.css
123 ms
ga.js
87 ms
vuid.min.js
114 ms
getSegment.php
198 ms
checkOAuth.esi
36 ms
__utm.gif
46 ms
proxy.html
64 ms
263943016.webp
147 ms
t.dhj
31 ms
t.dhj
12 ms
cm
37 ms
x35248
129 ms
s-3271.xgi
19 ms
hbpix
57 ms
8 ms
24 ms
pixel
22 ms
pixel
21 ms
52154.gif
12 ms
2981
25 ms
lifevision.se accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lifevision.se best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lifevision.se SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
SV
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifevision.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lifevision.se main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifevision.se
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifevision. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: