Tools & Wizards About Us
liftport.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

liftport.com

LiftPort Group - LiftPort: The Space Elevator Company

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

750 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

442 ms

liftport.com screenshot

About Website

Visit liftport.com now to see the best up-to-date Lift Port content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about liftport.com

Welcome to LiftPort, the future of space transportation! Our innovative technology uses sustainable energy and cutting-edge materials science to construct a megastructure that will revolutionize space...

Visit liftport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Liftport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 750 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

liftport.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

liftport.com

750 ms

style.css

129 ms

css

22 ms

social_widget.css

91 ms

flexslider.css

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Liftport.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (750 ms) belongs to the original domain Liftport.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 723.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Liftport.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 21.2 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 420.1 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lift Port needs image optimization as it can save up to 420.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 160.7 kB

  • Original 239.4 kB
  • After minification 201.2 kB
  • After compression 78.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 125.8 kB

  • Original 143.5 kB
  • After minification 113.4 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liftport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 125.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (57%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lift Port. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

liftport.com

liftport.com

750 ms

style.css

style.css

129 ms

css

css

22 ms

social_widget.css

social_widget.css

91 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

128 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

126 ms

style.css

style.css

250 ms

epicslider.css

epicslider.css

187 ms

udt_shortcodes.css

udt_shortcodes.css

234 ms

liftport.com

liftport.com

626 ms

udt_media_queries.css

udt_media_queries.css

251 ms

liftport.com

liftport.com

689 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

253 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

483 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

312 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

6 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

17 ms

jquery.mobile-touch-swipe-1.0.js

jquery.mobile-touch-swipe-1.0.js

314 ms

iOS-timer.js

iOS-timer.js

312 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

375 ms

jquery.epicslider.js

jquery.epicslider.js

375 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

375 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

439 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

437 ms

jquery.ajaxloading.js

jquery.ajaxloading.js

439 ms

onepage.js

onepage.js

503 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js

502 ms

jquery.metadata.js

jquery.metadata.js

503 ms

common.js

common.js

544 ms

udt_shortcodes.js

udt_shortcodes.js

568 ms

contact.js

contact.js

567 ms

js

js

23 ms

ga.js

ga.js

12 ms

LiftPort-Logo-Small.png

LiftPort-Logo-Small.png

74 ms

4-ROVER.jpg

4-ROVER.jpg

315 ms

3-RAMP-PLATFORM.jpg

3-RAMP-PLATFORM.jpg

433 ms

2-MASTER-PLAN-Bottom1.jpg

2-MASTER-PLAN-Bottom1.jpg

435 ms

Front-Page-Slide-1-Image.jpg

Front-Page-Slide-1-Image.jpg

500 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

250 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

314 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

501 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

441 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

566 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

557 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

558 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

565 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

625 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

494 ms

section_background_pattern_odd.png

section_background_pattern_odd.png

551 ms

Home-Page-Image.jpg

Home-Page-Image.jpg

615 ms

slider_overlay_pattern.png

slider_overlay_pattern.png

556 ms

page-top.png

page-top.png

558 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

LIftPortB_2.ttf

LIftPortB_2.ttf

535 ms

nav-theme-default.png

nav-theme-default.png

67 ms

X1g_KwGeBV3ajZIXQ9VnDibsRidxnYrfzLNRqJkHfFo.ttf

X1g_KwGeBV3ajZIXQ9VnDibsRidxnYrfzLNRqJkHfFo.ttf

7 ms

Accessibility Review

liftport.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

liftport.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

liftport.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liftport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liftport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

liftport.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lift Port. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: