Tools & Wizards About Us
lightingaudits.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

lightingaudits.com

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

672 ms

Page Rendered

287 ms

lightingaudits.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lightingaudits content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lightingaudits.com

Lighting Audits & Energy Benchmarking Servces

Visit lightingaudits.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lightingaudits.com page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 959 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lightingaudits.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lightingaudits.com

216 ms

lightingaudit.com

197 ms

www.lightingauditservices.com

99 ms

lasi.css

18 ms

analytics.js

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lightingaudits.com, 81% (17 requests) were made to Lightingauditservices.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (216 ms) belongs to the original domain Lightingaudits.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.3 kB (36%)

Content Size

185.5 kB

After Optimization

119.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lightingaudits.com main page is 185.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 126.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 503 B

  • Original 949 B
  • After minification 903 B
  • After compression 446 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 503 B or 53% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 126.5 kB
  • After minification 97.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lightingaudits needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 827 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lightingaudits.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lightingaudits. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lightingaudits.com

lightingaudits.com

216 ms

lightingaudit.com

lightingaudit.com

197 ms

www.lightingauditservices.com

www.lightingauditservices.com

99 ms

lasi.css

lasi.css

18 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

fadebggreen.jpg

fadebggreen.jpg

59 ms

headertl.png

headertl.png

60 ms

headerct.png

headerct.png

61 ms

headertr.png

headertr.png

62 ms

headercl.png

headercl.png

59 ms

Lighting_Audit_Services_Incorporated_LASI.png

Lighting_Audit_Services_Incorporated_LASI.png

70 ms

Lighting-Audit-Services-Inc2.gif

Lighting-Audit-Services-Inc2.gif

60 ms

headercr.png

headercr.png

66 ms

headerbl.png

headerbl.png

66 ms

headercb.png

headercb.png

69 ms

headerbr.png

headerbr.png

67 ms

Lighting-Audit-Services-is-a-USGBC-Member.gif

Lighting-Audit-Services-is-a-USGBC-Member.gif

86 ms

IESSustainingMember.gif

IESSustainingMember.gif

92 ms

power%20point%20slide.png

power%20point%20slide.png

113 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

print.css

print.css

17 ms

Accessibility Review

lightingaudits.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lightingaudits.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lightingaudits.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lightingaudits.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lightingaudits.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lightingaudits.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lightingaudits. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: