Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

lighttherapylampreviews.com

Best Light Therapy Lamp Reviews | Light Therapy Lights

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

454 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

406 ms

lighttherapylampreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lighttherapylampreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Light Therapy Lamp Reviews content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lighttherapylampreviews.com

Discover the best light therapy lamp reviews with real buyer feedback. We also review where you should buy light therapy lights for up to 46% off!

Visit lighttherapylampreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lighttherapylampreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 454 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lighttherapylampreviews.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,010 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.299

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lighttherapylampreviews.com

454 ms

style.css

39 ms

style.min.css

158 ms

style.min.css

155 ms

style.min.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Lighttherapylampreviews.com, 20% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (845 ms) belongs to the original domain Lighttherapylampreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 371.6 kB (61%)

Content Size

604.2 kB

After Optimization

232.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Lighttherapylampreviews.com main page is 604.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 420.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 38.3 kB
  • After minification 38.3 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 53.9 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Light Therapy Lamp Reviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 91.5 kB
  • After minification 90.0 kB
  • After compression 65.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 311.5 kB

  • Original 420.5 kB
  • After minification 420.3 kB
  • After compression 109.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lighttherapylampreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 311.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (50%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Light Therapy Lamp Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lighttherapylampreviews.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

lighttherapylampreviews.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lighttherapylampreviews.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lighttherapylampreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lighttherapylampreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Light Therapy Lamp Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: