1.9 sec in total
76 ms
1.3 sec
603 ms
Click here to check amazing Lime Goat content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about limegoat.com
Lime Goat is a digital marketing and advertising agency based in Scottsdale and Phoenix specializing in Investors Relations, Corporate Websites, and more!
Visit limegoat.comWe analyzed Limegoat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
limegoat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value1,720 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.074
95/100
15%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
76 ms
110 ms
15 ms
25 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Limegoat.com, 19% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (332 ms) belongs to the original domain Limegoat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 407.4 kB (8%)
4.8 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Limegoat.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 147.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lime Goat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 108.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Limegoat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.8 kB or 47% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (67%)
72
24
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lime Goat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
limegoat.com
76 ms
js
110 ms
style.min.css
15 ms
eae.min.css
25 ms
v4-shims.min.css
32 ms
all.min.css
35 ms
vegas.min.css
34 ms
styles.css
30 ms
close-button-icon.css
34 ms
YouTubePopUp.css
32 ms
style.css
42 ms
dashicons.min.css
52 ms
css
34 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
36 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
41 ms
swiper.min.css
39 ms
post-627.css
40 ms
global.css
44 ms
post-2.css
44 ms
style.css
47 ms
css
45 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
54 ms
devtools-detect.js
54 ms
jquery.min.js
57 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
56 ms
snazzymaps.js
56 ms
YouTubePopUp.jquery.js
70 ms
YouTubePopUp.js
71 ms
wp_vFtGhKjLm.js
331 ms
js
98 ms
animations.min.css
92 ms
eae.min.js
98 ms
v4-shims.min.js
99 ms
animated-main.min.js
101 ms
particles.min.js
102 ms
magnific.min.js
103 ms
vegas.min.js
101 ms
index.js
105 ms
index.js
105 ms
scripts.min.js
153 ms
custom.js
151 ms
common.js
151 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
147 ms
maxmegamenu.js
135 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
134 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
161 ms
waypoints.min.js
158 ms
core.min.js
160 ms
frontend.min.js
159 ms
tracking.js
171 ms
logo_white.png
153 ms
ir-websites.png
153 ms
corporate.png
154 ms
brand.png
153 ms
ir.png
155 ms
stock-ticker-limegoat.jpg
235 ms
limegoat-lobby.jpg
236 ms
Slider-2.jpg
268 ms
SLider-1.jpg
269 ms
slider-3.jpg
290 ms
IR-Websites-Essa-Bank.png
210 ms
IR-Websites-LMP-Motors.png
239 ms
IR-Websites-Hoth-Therapeutics.png
332 ms
IR-Board.jpg
270 ms
video-slide1.png
301 ms
play.png
289 ms
Slider-22-Limegoat.jpg
295 ms
ir-connect-300x87.png
284 ms
limegoat-websites.jpg
322 ms
logo_footer.png
319 ms
logo_footer.png
297 ms
analytics.js
103 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
64 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf
84 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
94 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEA.ttf
97 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
96 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf
99 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
96 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf
97 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
97 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf
99 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
99 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf
98 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
99 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf
100 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
99 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEA.ttf
101 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
122 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntF.ttf
123 ms
modules.woff
100 ms
wARDj0u
2 ms
collect
56 ms
limegoat.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
limegoat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
limegoat.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Limegoat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Limegoat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
limegoat.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lime Goat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: