3 sec in total
412 ms
2.3 sec
252 ms
Click here to check amazing Lime Talk content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about limetalk.com
Chat for your website or e-shop. Intuitive interface, smart features, friendly price. The most popular chat on the market. Try for free!
Visit limetalk.comWe analyzed Limetalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 412 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
limetalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
412 ms
186 ms
237 ms
356 ms
585 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Limetalk.com, 16% (8 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 16% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) belongs to the original domain Limetalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 337.5 kB (54%)
628.8 kB
291.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Limetalk.com main page is 628.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 355.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lime Talk needs image optimization as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 250.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 250.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Limetalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (46%)
48
26
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lime Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
limetalk.com
412 ms
186 ms
style.css
237 ms
jquery-ui.css
356 ms
jquery.js
585 ms
scrollTo.js
245 ms
jquery-ui.js
703 ms
landing.js
356 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
a4aab250e2852d571e5aeb3f4754ad38
418 ms
logoa2.png
121 ms
play.png
124 ms
en_right.png
414 ms
en_left_1_bg.png
121 ms
en_left_2_bg.png
124 ms
features_s1.png
122 ms
features_s2.png
272 ms
features_s3.png
273 ms
feature_shape.png
258 ms
widgets.js
48 ms
collect
46 ms
circle-full.png
172 ms
circle-empty.png
153 ms
plusone.js
89 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
120 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
147 ms
like.php
227 ms
langselect.png
234 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
57 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
84 ms
fastbutton
166 ms
syndication
184 ms
456694455177719809
220 ms
postmessageRelay
152 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
528 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
587 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
47 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
60 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
89 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
87 ms
widgetLoader.js
128 ms
pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
71 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
32 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
36 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
9 ms
proxy.jpg
91 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
7 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
5 ms
8qmvNZ4z_normal.png
135 ms
Mv4fgDci_normal.jpg
163 ms
jot.html
2 ms
limetalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
limetalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
limetalk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Limetalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Limetalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
limetalk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lime Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: