9.2 sec in total
513 ms
8.1 sec
603 ms
Welcome to limitscale.com homepage info - get ready to check Limitscale best content right away, or after learning these important things about limitscale.com
Limitscale digital commerce services - strategy, design, technology, contents and digital marketing – go digital to lead.
Visit limitscale.comWe analyzed Limitscale.com page load time and found that the first response time was 513 ms and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
limitscale.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value20.6 s
0/100
10%
Value1,930 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
513 ms
998 ms
1209 ms
1234 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Limitscale.com, 59% (35 requests) were made to Limitscale.io and 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Limitscale.io.
Page size can be reduced by 238.7 kB (7%)
3.4 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Limitscale.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 157.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Limitscale images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Limitscale.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (65%)
46
16
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Limitscale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
limitscale.com
513 ms
limitscale.com
998 ms
limitscale.io
1209 ms
e981f.css
1234 ms
icon
30 ms
76d40.css
1258 ms
a5ff7.css
1466 ms
f06df.css
1970 ms
css
30 ms
c4777.css
1720 ms
css
30 ms
css
29 ms
f79a8.js
1953 ms
css
15 ms
js
69 ms
css
14 ms
01d63.css
1778 ms
1f540.js
2070 ms
b68ea.js
2220 ms
e0c07.js
3059 ms
5a8ed.js
2786 ms
0d82c.js
2986 ms
19516.js
2717 ms
api.js
42 ms
5839d.js
3074 ms
d8def.js
3229 ms
864c2.js
3700 ms
165fc.js
3576 ms
9f110.js
3725 ms
42c55.js
3880 ms
l.js
119 ms
gtm.js
116 ms
h2-img-11.jpg
2095 ms
limitscale-black.png
1602 ms
limitscale-white.png
1766 ms
dummy.png
1844 ms
commerce-1.jpg
2100 ms
technology-1.jpg
2689 ms
consulting-2.jpg
2706 ms
outsourcing-1.jpg
2248 ms
Marketing-1.jpg
3050 ms
strategy.jpg
3384 ms
design.jpg
2585 ms
h2-img-10.jpg
2492 ms
digital-experience.jpg
2979 ms
mobile-app.jpg
2828 ms
ecommerce-list.jpg
2927 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRR23z.ttf
47 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRR23z.ttf
60 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
110 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
111 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
111 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
112 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
111 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
109 ms
client.js
30 ms
client_default.css
31 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
2928 ms
recaptcha__en.js
23 ms
limitscale.com accessibility score
limitscale.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
limitscale.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Limitscale.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Limitscale.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
limitscale.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Limitscale. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: