Tools & Wizards About Us
linefeed.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

linefeed.net

Linefeed - Novelty Fashion and Accessories

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

107 ms

Resources Loaded

985 ms

Page Rendered

232 ms

linefeed.net screenshot

About Website

Visit linefeed.net now to see the best up-to-date Linefeed content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about linefeed.net

Vast Choice of Novelty Fashion and Accessories. Zero or Small Shipping Fee. Money Back Guarantee. Take a Look!

Visit linefeed.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Linefeed.net page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

linefeed.net performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,930 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

linefeed.net

107 ms

aq.asp

103 ms

k_index.htm

188 ms

aw.asp

27 ms

aw0.htm

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Linefeed.net, 13% (6 requests) were made to Voi.la and 4% (2 requests) were made to Linefeed.secure.myhosting.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (566 ms) relates to the external source Voi.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 kB (2%)

Content Size

58.7 kB

After Optimization

57.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Linefeed.net main page is 58.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 57.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 750 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 622 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 750 B or 55% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 532 B

  • Original 57.4 kB
  • After minification 56.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Linefeed images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (41%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linefeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

linefeed.net

linefeed.net

107 ms

aq.asp

aq.asp

103 ms

k_index.htm

k_index.htm

188 ms

aw.asp

aw.asp

27 ms

aw0.htm

aw0.htm

76 ms

jcart.asp

jcart.asp

54 ms

hintergrund.gif

hintergrund.gif

29 ms

o_k_menu.htm

o_k_menu.htm

35 ms

k_main.htm

k_main.htm

38 ms

u_k_menu.htm

u_k_menu.htm

60 ms

logoneu1.gif

logoneu1.gif

34 ms

empty.gif

empty.gif

32 ms

logoneu2.gif

logoneu2.gif

38 ms

d11.gif

d11.gif

39 ms

d12.gif

d12.gif

38 ms

d13.gif

d13.gif

53 ms

d00.gif

d00.gif

53 ms

blk.gif

blk.gif

54 ms

hi_1_1.gif

hi_1_1.gif

52 ms

hi_1_2.gif

hi_1_2.gif

60 ms

hi_1_3.gif

hi_1_3.gif

60 ms

k_mn_th.htm

k_mn_th.htm

90 ms

k_intro.htm

k_intro.htm

82 ms

k_right.htm

k_right.htm

71 ms

hi_4_1.gif

hi_4_1.gif

53 ms

hi_4_2.gif

hi_4_2.gif

86 ms

hi_4_3.gif

hi_4_3.gif

95 ms

d20.gif

d20.gif

95 ms

d21.gif

d21.gif

95 ms

d22.gif

d22.gif

97 ms

d23.gif

d23.gif

95 ms

hi_2_3.gif

hi_2_3.gif

45 ms

151380.jpg

151380.jpg

472 ms

140140.jpg

140140.jpg

560 ms

CT1012.jpg

CT1012.jpg

565 ms

151853.jpg

151853.jpg

565 ms

132140.jpg

132140.jpg

564 ms

151718.jpg

151718.jpg

566 ms

tom-on-pillow-tie-red.jpg

tom-on-pillow-tie-red.jpg

63 ms

visa.gif

visa.gif

49 ms

vbv.gif

vbv.gif

48 ms

mc.gif

mc.gif

42 ms

mcsc.gif

mcsc.gif

47 ms

amex.gif

amex.gif

59 ms

dc.gif

dc.gif

67 ms

pp.gif

pp.gif

70 ms

hi_2_1.gif

hi_2_1.gif

67 ms

go.gif

go.gif

73 ms

Accessibility Review

linefeed.net accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

linefeed.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

linefeed.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linefeed.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Linefeed.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

linefeed.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Linefeed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: