5.6 sec in total
147 ms
3.3 sec
2.1 sec
Visit link.build now to see the best up-to-date Link content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about link.build
Link.Build is THE premier link building agency focused on acquiring quality backlinks. Engage our white label link building agency!
Visit link.buildWe analyzed Link.build page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
link.build performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value2,910 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value21.4 s
1/100
10%
147 ms
312 ms
194 ms
347 ms
221 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Link.build, 2% (2 requests) were made to Collectcdn.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Link.build.
Page size can be reduced by 317.0 kB (14%)
2.3 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Link.build main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 143.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Link images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 277 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 831 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Link.build has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (58%)
83
35
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Link. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
link.build
147 ms
link.build
312 ms
style-blocks.build.css
194 ms
premium-addons.min.css
347 ms
screen.min.css
221 ms
style.min.css
222 ms
theme.min.css
259 ms
frontend.min.css
248 ms
post-6.css
368 ms
widget-image.min.css
372 ms
e-animation-grow.min.css
380 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
405 ms
widget-heading.min.css
420 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
504 ms
swiper.min.css
505 ms
e-swiper.min.css
531 ms
frontend.min.css
534 ms
widget-animated-headline.min.css
558 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
572 ms
widget-video.min.css
661 ms
shapes.min.css
671 ms
widget-image-carousel.min.css
684 ms
e-animation-float.min.css
687 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
723 ms
widget-nested-tabs.min.css
732 ms
widget-accordion.min.css
814 ms
post-9.css
823 ms
post-16.css
838 ms
post-66.css
840 ms
css
44 ms
fontawesome.min.css
882 ms
solid.min.css
900 ms
jquery.min.js
1017 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
984 ms
js
72 ms
front.min.js
972 ms
dismiss.js
974 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1223 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1235 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1257 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1087 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1061 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1076 ms
hooks.min.js
1032 ms
i18n.min.js
1166 ms
frontend.min.js
1058 ms
core.min.js
1065 ms
frontend.min.js
1105 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1055 ms
launcher.js
254 ms
LinkBuild-final1-white.png
362 ms
new-hero-1.webp
549 ms
LinkBuild-final1-white.png
303 ms
left-1.jpg
629 ms
carmax.png
498 ms
expedia.png
521 ms
fresh.png
531 ms
godaddy.png
548 ms
princess.png
669 ms
purple.png
689 ms
shopify.png
691 ms
teachable.png
711 ms
trip.png
714 ms
vitamin.png
822 ms
godaddy.png
1218 ms
purple.png
1228 ms
nighcap.png
1258 ms
carmax.png
1243 ms
pbsm5-1.webp
1049 ms
pbsm4-1024x683.webp
1101 ms
seth-godin-1-1024x463.png
1667 ms
left01.jpg
1372 ms
left02.jpg
1462 ms
left03.jpg
1330 ms
elearning-link-building-case-study-1024x800.png
1424 ms
font
71 ms
font
71 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1369 ms
seo-link-building-services-client-case-studies-1024x833.png
1548 ms
client-seo-results-1024x136.jpeg
1480 ms
link-building-case-study-law-firm-1024x188.png
1559 ms
link-building-service-results-1-1024x132.jpeg
1556 ms
LinkBuild-final1-white.png
1311 ms
63a0f6de50094935eaaa0352
130 ms
details
330 ms
minified.js
100 ms
widget.js
45 ms
5e3d492ab2ce7a09e6362974-63a0f6de50094935eaaa0352.jpeg
286 ms
link.build accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
link.build best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
link.build SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Link.build can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Link.build main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
link.build
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Link. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: