4.7 sec in total
122 ms
2.4 sec
2.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Linksharks content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about linksharks.com
WordPress.com is the best place for your personal blog or business site.
Visit linksharks.comWe analyzed Linksharks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
linksharks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value7.1 s
51/100
10%
122 ms
46 ms
216 ms
269 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Linksharks.com, 23% (21 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 14% (13 requests) were made to Linksharksdotcom.files.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Bluehost-cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 504.1 kB (30%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Linksharks.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Linksharks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 394.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Linksharks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (51%)
76
37
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Linksharks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
linksharks.com
122 ms
webfont.js
46 ms
216 ms
css
269 ms
215 ms
226 ms
263 ms
gprofiles.js
193 ms
wpgroho.js
238 ms
208 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
165 ms
w.js
190 ms
css
164 ms
merriweather.css
38 ms
geometric-2.jpg
238 ms
7934039676_bdbfe39813_z.jpg
786 ms
show
256 ms
160x300.gif
255 ms
300x250-1.png
252 ms
2.jpg
1560 ms
image-7913839-12246244-1443459880000
244 ms
200x200-2.gif
708 ms
bh-120x120-03-dy.png
1573 ms
261d9dfc6997aaf47b807aadcc916ac0
698 ms
ee619b3af9a074a2887a00a0ade02df9
701 ms
2d3b6b8bb8be50bc2123adb298a046f2
876 ms
e8d98b80fb7555f68e46fee40dbb605a
1070 ms
27f9fd0475659b91a78ac13c9164a7e7
876 ms
body-bkg.png
180 ms
container-bkg.png
182 ms
header-left-bkg.png
633 ms
header-right-bkg.png
633 ms
search-input-key.png
688 ms
search-input-button.png
686 ms
post-head-bkg.png
688 ms
post-comment-icon.png
655 ms
widget-bot-bkg.png
685 ms
container-bot-bkg.png
685 ms
footer-widget-area-top-bkg.png
735 ms
footer-widget-area-bot-bkg.png
735 ms
6848823919_724f516a05_z.jpg
1229 ms
7910370882_39d180fb66_z.jpg
1064 ms
15995840461_9c925c574f_o.jpg
1137 ms
9083456691_19d1ab512d_o.jpg
679 ms
12436288584_69873009be_o.png
724 ms
5375975683_7b184ee6da_o.jpg
1128 ms
4463263739_9909191607_o.jpg
1131 ms
3452579244_303afbae17_o.jpg
1128 ms
5330351382_d227999285_o.png
1133 ms
3421327165_ddbf65fec7_z.jpg
1218 ms
17895972759_c5d9e20d3f_o-2.jpg
1213 ms
8483262447_02e4fa5b2a_z.jpg
1223 ms
NNlEEGVDWlniEj1grIL2zfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
574 ms
u8HSyiSSzbmPRVNA5BNhqA.woff
902 ms
2yXG0u2oPiXdRt7OARC1e_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
983 ms
F3_q9tzkRUEMjTtsySoCaA.woff
983 ms
cxbOUSTgtyl7V_qnBf4BYxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
983 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
983 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMQFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
1066 ms
Genericons.svg
520 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
15 ms
560_10000120.jpg
966 ms
Noticons.svg
831 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
7 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
754 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
827 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
825 ms
120x600_en.png
831 ms
531 ms
master.html
526 ms
hovercard.css
214 ms
services.css
390 ms
graph.facebook.com
638 ms
g.gif
368 ms
graph.facebook.com
734 ms
graph.facebook.com
734 ms
graph.facebook.com
724 ms
graph.facebook.com
721 ms
g.gif
254 ms
g.gif
253 ms
g.gif
254 ms
g.gif
253 ms
g.gif
247 ms
g.gif
515 ms
g.gif
517 ms
jquery.js
397 ms
global-print.css
93 ms
postmessage.js
128 ms
jed.js
129 ms
underscore.min.js
128 ms
linksharks.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
linksharks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
linksharks.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Linksharks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Linksharks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
linksharks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Linksharks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: