Tools & Wizards About Us
litec-computer.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

litec-computer.de

CM Systemhaus GmbH · IT Systemhaus in der Region Hannover

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

339 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

litec-computer.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to litec-computer.de homepage info - get ready to check Litec Computer best content right away, or after learning these important things about litec-computer.de

IT-Systemhaus, Cloud Service, Handwerkersoftware, Topkontor Handwerk und Zeiterfassung, die Cloud für Kleinbetriebe, Mittelstand und Existenzgründer.

Visit litec-computer.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Litec-computer.de page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

litec-computer.de performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

litec-computer.de

339 ms

www.computerchannel.de

364 ms

www.handytarifevergleich.de

811 ms

b0c8375f0a1e88bcb807dc405c74b4e3.css

427 ms

94337dc62baaf3b44c3280010c70ca3d.css

332 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Litec-computer.de, 49% (33 requests) were made to Handytarifevergleich.de and 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (977 ms) relates to the external source Handytarifevergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 465.2 kB (56%)

Content Size

826.9 kB

After Optimization

361.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Litec-computer.de main page is 826.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 314.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 46.5 kB

  • Original 63.2 kB
  • After minification 61.4 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 174.7 kB
  • After minification 169.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litec Computer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 187.0 kB

  • Original 314.5 kB
  • After minification 312.8 kB
  • After compression 127.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 226.8 kB

  • Original 274.5 kB
  • After minification 274.1 kB
  • After compression 47.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litec-computer.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (63%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litec Computer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

litec-computer.de

litec-computer.de

339 ms

www.computerchannel.de

www.computerchannel.de

364 ms

www.handytarifevergleich.de

www.handytarifevergleich.de

811 ms

b0c8375f0a1e88bcb807dc405c74b4e3.css

b0c8375f0a1e88bcb807dc405c74b4e3.css

427 ms

94337dc62baaf3b44c3280010c70ca3d.css

94337dc62baaf3b44c3280010c70ca3d.css

332 ms

216dd8a121c46746496717b789f21a00.css

216dd8a121c46746496717b789f21a00.css

332 ms

89b3ae678fa1b16ca7b2b37431903e0e.css

89b3ae678fa1b16ca7b2b37431903e0e.css

333 ms

95385a763a23e8b56ed064f87e38049e.css

95385a763a23e8b56ed064f87e38049e.css

335 ms

e423e513f423aec6b77d2a176654f0a6.css

e423e513f423aec6b77d2a176654f0a6.css

451 ms

f56d1b7f1f82127c20ed42a5e15627fc.css

f56d1b7f1f82127c20ed42a5e15627fc.css

445 ms

f9489edb8cdd4e677ce8f697f133accc.css

f9489edb8cdd4e677ce8f697f133accc.css

447 ms

458aebecc49e5fe69c06cd217e976dd0.css

458aebecc49e5fe69c06cd217e976dd0.css

449 ms

a71348610e7b09e81995984b723e1340.js

a71348610e7b09e81995984b723e1340.js

781 ms

7eb234e3a21bd0e1357a65be2bb30f15.js

7eb234e3a21bd0e1357a65be2bb30f15.js

531 ms

css

css

58 ms

jsapi

jsapi

36 ms

txhandytarifrechner.php

txhandytarifrechner.php

548 ms

691f753c6d08d27d05841db0191471cb.js

691f753c6d08d27d05841db0191471cb.js

335 ms

9baca1017b079e6310713e8d6bdfbca8.js

9baca1017b079e6310713e8d6bdfbca8.js

334 ms

c2a95ef5c72a3a652077eb692f69d00d.js

c2a95ef5c72a3a652077eb692f69d00d.js

338 ms

3246816cf9e2037ca248370fd738530a.js

3246816cf9e2037ca248370fd738530a.js

341 ms

8a0e78a889083df785186d0235eff306.js

8a0e78a889083df785186d0235eff306.js

420 ms

21e027da90b19514e18c595d74709430.js

21e027da90b19514e18c595d74709430.js

446 ms

cd5524d27ab88a3150a3b306ea27f60f.js

cd5524d27ab88a3150a3b306ea27f60f.js

446 ms

2cd8e88db6b8f10aa28b063ed0805438.js

2cd8e88db6b8f10aa28b063ed0805438.js

450 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

191 ms

ga.js

ga.js

75 ms

prum.min.js

prum.min.js

174 ms

gray_jean.png

gray_jean.png

166 ms

handytarifevergleich-logo.png

handytarifevergleich-logo.png

165 ms

social-sprites.png

social-sprites.png

165 ms

txhandytarifrechnerstyle.min.css

txhandytarifrechnerstyle.min.css

149 ms

t_netz.png

t_netz.png

200 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

150 ms

uid-285.css

uid-285.css

334 ms

qxqBOmIg-1Y

qxqBOmIg-1Y

201 ms

v_netz.png

v_netz.png

183 ms

o_netz.png

o_netz.png

182 ms

e_netz.png

e_netz.png

182 ms

handytarife-vergleich-300x200.jpg

handytarife-vergleich-300x200.jpg

137 ms

handy-tarifvergleich-300x200.jpg

handy-tarifvergleich-300x200.jpg

136 ms

handynutzung-300x200.jpg

handynutzung-300x200.jpg

332 ms

neues-smartphone-aus-vergleich-300x177.jpg

neues-smartphone-aus-vergleich-300x177.jpg

332 ms

lte-geschwindigkeit-300x200.jpg

lte-geschwindigkeit-300x200.jpg

356 ms

allnet-flat-vergleich-300x196.jpg

allnet-flat-vergleich-300x196.jpg

353 ms

prepaid-vergleich-300x199.jpg

prepaid-vergleich-300x199.jpg

397 ms

handyauswahl-300x200.jpg

handyauswahl-300x200.jpg

329 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

148 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

157 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

173 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

172 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

182 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

977 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

50 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

20 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

34 ms

base.js

base.js

57 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

31 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

77 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

46 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

46 ms

46 ms

ui+en.css

ui+en.css

19 ms

format+en,default+en,ui+en,corechart+en.I.js

format+en,default+en,ui+en,corechart+en.I.js

31 ms

2714.png

2714.png

419 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

62 ms

txhandytarifrechnerscript.min.js

txhandytarifrechnerscript.min.js

108 ms

Accessibility Review

litec-computer.de accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

litec-computer.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

litec-computer.de SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litec-computer.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litec-computer.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

litec-computer.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Litec Computer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: