Tools & Wizards About Us
litegation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

litegation.com

Award-Winning Litigation Support Specialist | New Jersey | New York

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

145 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

564 ms

litegation.com screenshot

About Website

Visit litegation.com now to see the best up-to-date Litegation content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litegation.com

Providing Litigation Support Services such as Professional Consulting, Trial Technology, And Matter(Discovery) Management That Supports Your Litigation

Visit litegation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Litegation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

litegation.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.641

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

litegation.com

145 ms

litegation.com

3733 ms

js

45 ms

style.min.css

180 ms

frontend.min.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Litegation.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Litegation.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 508.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Litegation.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 119.5 kB

  • Original 148.7 kB
  • After minification 143.8 kB
  • After compression 29.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 946 B

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litegation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 283.5 kB

  • Original 628.6 kB
  • After minification 628.6 kB
  • After compression 345.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 283.5 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 104.7 kB

  • Original 328.0 kB
  • After minification 304.6 kB
  • After compression 223.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litegation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.7 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (54%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litegation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

litegation.com

litegation.com

145 ms

litegation.com

litegation.com

3733 ms

js

js

45 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

180 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

191 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

181 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

185 ms

css

css

29 ms

style.css

style.css

245 ms

full-styles.6.1.1.css

full-styles.6.1.1.css

367 ms

mkhb-render.css

mkhb-render.css

187 ms

mkhb-row.css

mkhb-row.css

245 ms

mkhb-column.css

mkhb-column.css

250 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

314 ms

theme-options-production-1722451961.css

theme-options-production-1722451961.css

268 ms

style.css

style.css

311 ms

modern.css

modern.css

328 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

328 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

339 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

487 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

391 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

392 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

447 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

355 ms

jquery.uniform.min.js

jquery.uniform.min.js

383 ms

custom.js

custom.js

404 ms

idle-timer.min.js

idle-timer.min.js

405 ms

full-scripts.6.1.1.js

full-scripts.6.1.1.js

580 ms

mkhb-render.js

mkhb-render.js

520 ms

mkhb-column.js

mkhb-column.js

521 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

522 ms

7TOg-PxIAfs

7TOg-PxIAfs

465 ms

5Ed8wHWKqSc

5Ed8wHWKqSc

481 ms

pHHP5t4ctes

pHHP5t4ctes

812 ms

litmenu-1.png

litmenu-1.png

669 ms

litegation-website-white-logo.png

litegation-website-white-logo.png

446 ms

litegation-website-logo.png

litegation-website-logo.png

445 ms

untitled-design-3.png

untitled-design-3.png

466 ms

untitled-design-4.png

untitled-design-4.png

798 ms

untitled-design-3-300x300.png

untitled-design-3-300x300.png

466 ms

ediscovery-process-mtzdy57ol3ek3scbvfk6jw9sqaus4opkvtdzxvy4c0.jpg

ediscovery-process-mtzdy57ol3ek3scbvfk6jw9sqaus4opkvtdzxvy4c0.jpg

668 ms

dummy-transparent-nm80slgtsua0fa1eei3959iw3ntqoqqg6wtzs9oex4.png

dummy-transparent-nm80slgtsua0fa1eei3959iw3ntqoqqg6wtzs9oex4.png

466 ms

Litegation_eBook_3002.jpg

Litegation_eBook_3002.jpg

754 ms

logo_W_BL.png

logo_W_BL.png

754 ms

litegation-blogs-3-150x150.png

litegation-blogs-3-150x150.png

753 ms

litegation-blogs-150x150.png

litegation-blogs-150x150.png

798 ms

shutterstock_618880562-150x150.jpg

shutterstock_618880562-150x150.jpg

798 ms

generate-captcha.php

generate-captcha.php

880 ms

web-video-1.png

web-video-1.png

860 ms

web-video-2.png

web-video-2.png

502 ms

bigstock-Business-people-shaking-hands-13867664.jpg

bigstock-Business-people-shaking-hands-13867664.jpg

596 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

423 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

23 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

43 ms

base.js

base.js

70 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

345 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

305 ms

xmnuRLFIB2aI6qbGS483SdTuOq1a1O-XNl-4_rBMxeo.js

xmnuRLFIB2aI6qbGS483SdTuOq1a1O-XNl-4_rBMxeo.js

266 ms

embed.js

embed.js

191 ms

id

id

37 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

46 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

47 ms

Create

Create

189 ms

Create

Create

191 ms

Create

Create

263 ms

Accessibility Review

litegation.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

litegation.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

litegation.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litegation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litegation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

litegation.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Litegation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: