Tools & Wizards About Us
litepanels.jp screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

litepanels.jp

Litepanels | Stage & Studio LED Lighting, Video LED Lighting

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

820 ms

litepanels.jp screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Litepanels content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about litepanels.jp

Litepanels.com, the home of Gemini, Astra, Sola, Inca, Lykos lights. Soft and Hard LED light panels, Fresnel lights and On-camera lights. Emmy award winning LED lighting for broadcast and cinematograp...

Visit litepanels.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Litepanels.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

litepanels.jp performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,430 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

litepanels.jp

294 ms

276 ms

screen.css

566 ms

jquery.min.js

6 ms

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

284 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Litepanels.jp, 73% (46 requests) were made to Litepanels.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Litepanels.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.2 kB (50%)

Content Size

181.0 kB

After Optimization

89.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Litepanels.jp main page is 181.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 124.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 45.2 kB

  • Original 124.3 kB
  • After minification 122.4 kB
  • After compression 79.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.2 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (16%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

48

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litepanels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

litepanels.jp

litepanels.jp

294 ms

276 ms

screen.css

screen.css

566 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

6 ms

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

284 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

24 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

22 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

32 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

705 ms

logo.png

logo.png

114 ms

Brick_Slider1.jpg

Brick_Slider1.jpg

779 ms

Brick_Slider_mobile.jpeg

Brick_Slider_mobile.jpeg

114 ms

Manfrotto_lights_Banner_2.jpg

Manfrotto_lights_Banner_2.jpg

1045 ms

Manfrotto_lights_Banner_mobile.jpg

Manfrotto_lights_Banner_mobile.jpg

528 ms

astra111.jpg

astra111.jpg

447 ms

new-hero_litepanels.jpg

new-hero_litepanels.jpg

320 ms

Astra_Soft_Slider.jpg

Astra_Soft_Slider.jpg

2151 ms

Astra_Soft_Slider_mob.jpg

Astra_Soft_Slider_mob.jpg

480 ms

Smartlite%20App.jpg

Smartlite%20App.jpg

1448 ms

on-camera560.jpg

on-camera560.jpg

1231 ms

LP_Whitepaper_Banner_Fresnel_560x290_2.jpg

LP_Whitepaper_Banner_Fresnel_560x290_2.jpg

926 ms

LP_Astra_Soft_News-Events_Banner_560x290.jpg

LP_Astra_Soft_News-Events_Banner_560x290.jpg

964 ms

906-3001-Sola-12-3qtr-image1.jpg

906-3001-Sola-12-3qtr-image1.jpg

1018 ms

caliber%20kit%20(3).jpg

caliber%20kit%20(3).jpg

1530 ms

906-2002-sola-6-image1.jpg

906-2002-sola-6-image1.jpg

1184 ms

903-1002-Sola%20ENG%203%20quarter%20tall-image1.jpg

903-1002-Sola%20ENG%203%20quarter%20tall-image1.jpg

1128 ms

icon-spares.png

icon-spares.png

1218 ms

icon-site-support.png

icon-site-support.png

1270 ms

icon-warranty.png

icon-warranty.png

1300 ms

vitecvideocom.svg

vitecvideocom.svg

1311 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

1387 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1386 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

1395 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

1472 ms

106 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

312 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

33 ms

vitec-logo.png

vitec-logo.png

1438 ms

downarrow.png

downarrow.png

1441 ms

header-main-bg.png

header-main-bg.png

1514 ms

mobile-nav-btn.png

mobile-nav-btn.png

1519 ms

site-search-button.png

site-search-button.png

1528 ms

header-basket-icon.png

header-basket-icon.png

1528 ms

main-section-gradient.png

main-section-gradient.png

1580 ms

more-link-icon.png

more-link-icon.png

1580 ms

228 ms

collect

collect

185 ms

collect

collect

241 ms

texgyreheros-regular-webfont.woff

texgyreheros-regular-webfont.woff

1599 ms

texgyreheros-bold-webfont.woff

texgyreheros-bold-webfont.woff

1752 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

191 ms

1345 ms

elqCfg.min.js

elqCfg.min.js

21 ms

form-close-button.png

form-close-button.png

1341 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

1410 ms

usa.png

usa.png

1397 ms

26 ms

uk.png

uk.png

1449 ms

svrGP

svrGP

205 ms

germany.png

germany.png

1342 ms

country-dropdown-arrow.png

country-dropdown-arrow.png

1320 ms

svrGP.aspx

svrGP.aspx

52 ms

391 ms

Accessibility Review

litepanels.jp accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

litepanels.jp best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

litepanels.jp SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litepanels.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litepanels.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

litepanels.jp

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litepanels. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: