1.7 sec in total
348 ms
1.1 sec
300 ms
Click here to check amazing Litin content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about litin.com
PackEdge Corporation provides companies with an unparalleled selection of packaging products and equipment to meet every need.
Visit litin.comWe analyzed Litin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 348 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
litin.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value17.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value21.3 s
1/100
10%
348 ms
49 ms
54 ms
74 ms
78 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Litin.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Widgets.twimg.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (389 ms) belongs to the original domain Litin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.2 kB (21%)
1.2 MB
968.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Litin.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Litin needs image optimization as it can save up to 166.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 66.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (8%)
60
55
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
litin.com
348 ms
enable.js
49 ms
widget.js
54 ms
style.css
74 ms
orbit-1.2.3.css
78 ms
jquery-1.5.1.min.js
108 ms
jquery.orbit-1.2.3.min.js
87 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
menu.js
86 ms
screen.css
94 ms
bg.jpg
48 ms
logo.jpg
105 ms
call.png
50 ms
menu.png
40 ms
EQUIPMENT.png
48 ms
ECO-FRIENDLY%20PRODUCTS.png
43 ms
SERVICE.png
83 ms
CONVERTING%20PRODUCTS.png
87 ms
3dredvendorbut.jpg
131 ms
shop.png
134 ms
t_icon.png
93 ms
in_icon.png
121 ms
f_icon.png
124 ms
page_top.png
139 ms
page_middle.png
139 ms
loading.gif
159 ms
litin-mar16-banner2.jpg
239 ms
litin-mar16-banner1.jpg
216 ms
litin-mar16-banner6.jpg
262 ms
litin-mar16-banner4.jpg
303 ms
litin-mar16-banner3.jpg
254 ms
litin-mar16-banner5.jpg
270 ms
Boxes.jpg
272 ms
Bubble.jpg
275 ms
Chipboard.jpg
296 ms
Corrugated.jpg
308 ms
Edge.jpg
308 ms
Janitorial.jpg
318 ms
Kraft.jpg
314 ms
Labels.jpg
333 ms
LooseFill.jpg
352 ms
StretchFilms.jpg
352 ms
Shipping.jpg
350 ms
Mailing.jpg
353 ms
Mailing01.jpg
361 ms
PackingList.jpg
369 ms
PolyBags.jpg
366 ms
Protective.jpg
361 ms
ShippingRoom.jpg
368 ms
ShrinkFilm.jpg
354 ms
Strapping.jpg
367 ms
Strapping01.jpg
342 ms
ViewProductsbyVendor.png
353 ms
01.png
349 ms
02.png
389 ms
line.jpg
336 ms
litinconverting.jpg
335 ms
vendor-button.jpg
341 ms
fotter-sri.png
343 ms
pause-black.png
47 ms
bullets.jpg
43 ms
litin.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
litin.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
litin.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Litin.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
litin.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: