3.7 sec in total
143 ms
2.4 sec
1.1 sec
Visit litten.com now to see the best up-to-date Litten content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litten.com
Litten Associates public website
Visit litten.comWe analyzed Litten.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
litten.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
143 ms
156 ms
96 ms
22 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Litten.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Litten.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (4%)
22.8 MB
21.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Litten.com main page is 22.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 22.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 670.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litten images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 152.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 152.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litten.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (51%)
39
19
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litten. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litten.com
143 ms
bootstrap.min.css
156 ms
font-awesome.min.css
96 ms
css
22 ms
css
34 ms
general.css
96 ms
custom.css
67 ms
owl.carousel.css
69 ms
owl.theme.css
70 ms
style.css
196 ms
animate.css
175 ms
magnific-popup.css
106 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
125 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
190 ms
bootstrap.js
279 ms
owl.carousel.js
169 ms
script.js
163 ms
stickUp.min.js
278 ms
jquery.corner.js
278 ms
wow.min.js
278 ms
classie.js
279 ms
uiMorphingButton_inflow.js
279 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
284 ms
status.gif
63 ms
intro5.jpg
2024 ms
circle.png
66 ms
tweet.svg
63 ms
picture.svg
61 ms
retina.svg
92 ms
laptop.svg
94 ms
map.svg
96 ms
browser.svg
96 ms
ipad.png
539 ms
iphone.png
222 ms
doge.png
468 ms
1.png
673 ms
2.png
171 ms
3.png
443 ms
banner-bg.jpg
259 ms
lato-light.woff
299 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
53 ms
boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff
58 ms
lato-regular.woff
346 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
59 ms
lato-bold.woff
396 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
58 ms
lato-black.woff
446 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
58 ms
WJ6D195CfbTRlIs49IbkFw.woff
24 ms
0Aa8aBJcGN1n1zDNhqNrnQ.woff
23 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
425 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
439 ms
cross.png
348 ms
litten.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
litten.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
litten.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litten.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litten.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litten.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litten. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: