5.9 sec in total
1.9 sec
3.9 sec
193 ms
Visit livecode.com now to see the best up-to-date Live Code content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livecode.com
LiveCode - Develop Apps Yourself
Visit livecode.comWe analyzed Livecode.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
livecode.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
1/100
10%
Value15.4 s
0/100
25%
Value17.1 s
1/100
10%
Value1,260 ms
19/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.3 s
3/100
10%
1875 ms
166 ms
169 ms
170 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Livecode.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Livecode.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (61%)
4.5 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Livecode.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 379.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Live Code needs image optimization as it can save up to 379.1 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 573.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 573.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 573.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livecode.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 573.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (82%)
65
12
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Code. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livecode.com
1875 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
166 ms
q-a-plus.css
169 ms
jquery-ui.css
170 ms
livecode-projects.css
169 ms
style.css
171 ms
settings.css
249 ms
wpProQuiz_front.min.css
255 ms
style.css
256 ms
comments.css
258 ms
bootstrap.css
336 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
330 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
332 ms
theme.css
436 ms
template-category.css
332 ms
livecode.css
390 ms
bootstrap-social.css
412 ms
css
27 ms
eventon_styles.css
415 ms
font-awesome.css
419 ms
main.min.css
424 ms
font-awesome.min.css
473 ms
main.min.css
491 ms
main.min.css
496 ms
jquery.js
665 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
508 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
587 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
560 ms
picturefill.min.js
572 ms
Chart.min.js
579 ms
css
38 ms
codestyle.css
285 ms
highlight.pack.js
345 ms
jsapi
52 ms
eventon_dynamic_styles.css
352 ms
front.css
359 ms
learndash_template_style.css
597 ms
q-a-plus.js
596 ms
comment-reply.min.js
605 ms
jquery.form.min.js
604 ms
scripts.js
604 ms
social.js
604 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
606 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
603 ms
theme.js
686 ms
livecode.js
602 ms
functions.js
602 ms
wp-embed.min.js
602 ms
learndash_template_script.js
601 ms
cse.js
75 ms
lclogo1.png
507 ms
lc.png
572 ms
MacBook_Pro_Retina.png
1439 ms
iphone6s-shadow.png
401 ms
androids3-shadow.png
553 ms
newdp15-150x150.png
737 ms
map1-150x150.png
846 ms
mergext1-150x150.png
848 ms
hack3-150x150.jpg
767 ms
cse.js
352 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlEj2yz9RHX9Mk-2yzUB67_Y.ttf
151 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGB5JIUTYQ8VE98d8HBeU5G4.ttf
151 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGCH-qnDt0uPJOZUUhznkTq0.ttf
152 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGO2XAO3y59jwYldyr2GAzqM.ttf
151 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGAD27w_7GyaBwebaHTKWeA4.ttf
151 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGCtroqGasK-nicY6qOGcjLE.ttf
349 ms
analytics.js
141 ms
goal.min.js
177 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
276 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
244 ms
collect
13 ms
jsapi
17 ms
collect
73 ms
default+en.css
4 ms
default.css
53 ms
default+en.I.js
27 ms
default.css
14 ms
livecode.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
livecode.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
livecode.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livecode.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Livecode.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livecode.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Live Code. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: