24.5 sec in total
445 ms
23.6 sec
372 ms
Visit livejournal.org now to see the best up-to-date Live Journal content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livejournal.org
Your life is the best story! Just start your blog today!
Visit livejournal.orgWe analyzed Livejournal.org page load time and found that the first response time was 445 ms and then it took 24 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
livejournal.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value22.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value3,300 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.338
33/100
15%
Value22.2 s
1/100
10%
445 ms
49 ms
56 ms
79 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Livejournal.org, 16% (14 requests) were made to L-stat.livejournal.net and 11% (10 requests) were made to Ssp.rambler.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) relates to the external source Imrk.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (57%)
2.1 MB
889.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Livejournal.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 141.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 141.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Live Journal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 703.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 703.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 337.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livejournal.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 337.9 kB or 44% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (68%)
62
20
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
livejournal.org
445 ms
l-stat.livejournal.net
49 ms
l-stat.livejournal.net
56 ms
l-stat.livejournal.net
79 ms
get_auth_js.bml
130 ms
77 ms
50 ms
51 ms
xtcore.js
3 ms
top100.js
409 ms
yandex_metrika.js
119 ms
rta.js
146 ms
analytics.js
351 ms
26901
158 ms
306 ms
community.gif
97 ms
print-logo.png
98 ms
userinfo.gif
99 ms
11441681
123 ms
9991260
150 ms
1842643
152 ms
3171
151 ms
31636610
152 ms
3977915
153 ms
37968826
300 ms
gtm.js
151 ms
autocontext2_async.js
341 ms
beacon.js
115 ms
logo.svg
42 ms
s-icons.svg
44 ms
community_v3.svg
47 ms
246 ms
watch.js
12 ms
CaMCUg==
15 ms
6iMf6F5oPfgFuPAEB
14 ms
QRzzWv9J88AsQYwKv
12 ms
green2.min.js
527 ms
120 ms
emily
280 ms
begun.html
274 ms
emily
272 ms
autocontext2_async.js
270 ms
top100.scn
270 ms
171370253
263 ms
autocontext2.js
125 ms
autocontext2_async_main.d94e28a87d.js
440 ms
ban.ban
487 ms
hit.xiti
230 ms
autocontext2.js
282 ms
autocontext2_main.8328b00fb4.js
286 ms
pixel.gif
133 ms
autocontext2_main.8328b00fb4.js
293 ms
begun_scripts.508f4b3b74.js
131 ms
begun_scripts.508f4b3b74.js
140 ms
begun_utils.4a33756f76.js
133 ms
begun_utils.4a33756f76.js
141 ms
context.jsp
136 ms
context.jsp
136 ms
begun_tpl_block_468x60.2238ede18e.js
158 ms
begun_tpl_block_468x60.2238ede18e.js
124 ms
sandbox
313 ms
sync
428 ms
sync.gif
380 ms
saveRtbUser
328 ms
userbind
19937 ms
begun
325 ms
begun
333 ms
sync
437 ms
cnysBEGUN.gif
33 ms
rta.js
26 ms
log_errors
245 ms
log_errors
533 ms
begun
8 ms
cnysBEGUN.gif
9 ms
image
127 ms
sync
227 ms
pixel.gif
222 ms
begun
182 ms
sync
133 ms
audsp
211 ms
madnetx
234 ms
admitad
289 ms
audsp
114 ms
renegade
131 ms
sync2.204
292 ms
pixel
35 ms
pixel
20 ms
144 ms
sync
103 ms
pixel.gif
490 ms
livejournal.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
livejournal.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
livejournal.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livejournal.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Livejournal.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livejournal.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Live Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: