3.1 sec in total
350 ms
1.7 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Live Kit content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livekit.io
Instantly transport audio and video between LLMs and your users.
Visit livekit.ioWe analyzed Livekit.io page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
livekit.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
96/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value3,770 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
8/100
10%
350 ms
16 ms
24 ms
33 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Livekit.io, 2% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Livekit.io.
Page size can be reduced by 112.4 kB (64%)
175.0 kB
62.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Livekit.io main page is 175.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 127.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Live Kit needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (45%)
38
21
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Kit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
livekit.io
350 ms
b3eb46e9e0ef44a9.css
16 ms
29a220f7302df031.css
24 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
33 ms
webpack-bac7df137504ebc3.js
48 ms
framework-fb129ad84e3a607e.js
47 ms
main-a06d2b8948d7b516.js
54 ms
_app-63be5527314d3bb5.js
82 ms
42434754-cee2139031e87958.js
76 ms
619e6309-acd37e38b4b34a4e.js
75 ms
7a7c95a0-b6142c49f34ad0f8.js
75 ms
fdfbdcc1-be781700f6e2682c.js
74 ms
648-a82c3cf9c0805d85.js
76 ms
397-d2aeba12293f62a8.js
77 ms
8367-5c73d2beba7b6db2.js
78 ms
2382-13138fc0c46bf8d6.js
78 ms
index-b239a104ce934bd9.js
77 ms
_buildManifest.js
76 ms
_ssgManifest.js
78 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
66 ms
open-ai.svg
285 ms
character-ai.svg
292 ms
skydio.svg
290 ms
spotify.svg
291 ms
fanatics.svg
286 ms
phone-chrome.svg
289 ms
cartesia-wordmark.svg
490 ms
groq.svg
517 ms
deepgram.svg
537 ms
open-ai.svg
504 ms
cerebras.svg
511 ms
google.svg
546 ms
eleven-labs.png
727 ms
cloud-screen-1.svg
723 ms
sdk-faded.png
729 ms
unlocked.svg
736 ms
status-map.svg
761 ms
card-bg.svg
743 ms
everett-light.woff
656 ms
everett-regular.woff
681 ms
everett-medium.woff
681 ms
everett-bold.woff
688 ms
CommitMono-700-Regular.otf
713 ms
CommitMono-400-Regular.otf
712 ms
everett-mono-bold.woff
879 ms
everett-mono-medium.woff
907 ms
everett-mono-regular.woff
926 ms
everett-mono-thin.woff
1049 ms
main.js
268 ms
livekit.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
livekit.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
livekit.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livekit.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livekit.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livekit.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Live Kit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: