5.8 sec in total
625 ms
5 sec
161 ms
Click here to check amazing Livelife content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livelife.net.au
Visit livelife.net.auWe analyzed Livelife.net.au page load time and found that the first response time was 625 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
livelife.net.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.088
93/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
625 ms
844 ms
208 ms
619 ms
819 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Livelife.net.au, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Livelife.net.au.
Page size can be reduced by 32.8 kB (39%)
83.7 kB
50.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Livelife.net.au main page is 83.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 33.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livelife images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livelife.net.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 50% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (81%)
48
9
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livelife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livelife.net.au
625 ms
livelife.net.au
844 ms
skeleton.css
208 ms
styles.css
619 ms
responsive.css
819 ms
colour_tags-page0.css
821 ms
css
17 ms
css
31 ms
css
36 ms
css
33 ms
css
34 ms
css
34 ms
css
35 ms
javascript.js
822 ms
function.js
1433 ms
retina.js
824 ms
modernizr.min.js
824 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1024 ms
top_texture_lines_none.css
1025 ms
arrow_white.css
1029 ms
header_top_none.css
1032 ms
section_none.css
1031 ms
footer_none.css
1228 ms
extra_2_none.css
1230 ms
extra_3_none.css
1235 ms
title_normal.css
1236 ms
title_georgia.css
1238 ms
slogan_bold.css
1446 ms
slogan_lato.css
1445 ms
menu_noticia.css
1446 ms
footer_open.css
1446 ms
remove.js
1447 ms
slideshow.js
1641 ms
slide_3.js
1642 ms
cameraFade.js
2046 ms
headings_abel.css
1646 ms
content_open.css
1645 ms
content_13px.css
1648 ms
stacks.css
1848 ms
stacks_page_page0.css
1847 ms
stacks_page_page0.js
1852 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
Live_Life_logo1.jpg
613 ms
arrow_white2x.png
233 ms
slideshow_arrows.png
211 ms
camera-loader.gif
211 ms
slide_1.jpg
818 ms
font
134 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
167 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
167 ms
VuJ2dNDF2Yv9qppOePKYRP12Zjte.woff
210 ms
VuJpdNDF2Yv9qppOePKYRP1-3R5NuGvW.woff
183 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
167 ms
zocial-regular-webfont.woff
205 ms
collect
18 ms
js
91 ms
slide_2.jpg
616 ms
livelife.net.au accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livelife.net.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
livelife.net.au SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livelife.net.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livelife.net.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livelife.net.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livelife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: