Tools & Wizards About Us
liveprofile.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

liveprofile.com

LiveProfile

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

79 ms

liveprofile.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to liveprofile.com homepage info - get ready to check Live Profile best content right away, or after learning these important things about liveprofile.com

Stay connected with people and things that matter

Visit liveprofile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Liveprofile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

liveprofile.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.275

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

liveprofile.com

86 ms

areasnap.com

5994 ms

master-ResetCSS.css

87 ms

master-GlobalResults.css

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Liveprofile.com, 50% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.firstlook.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Areasnap.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) relates to the external source Areasnap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 kB (66%)

Content Size

2.8 kB

After Optimization

966 B

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Liveprofile.com main page is 2.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 233 B

  • Original 603 B
  • After minification 554 B
  • After compression 370 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233 B or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 596 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liveprofile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • AJAX
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Live Profile. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

liveprofile.com

liveprofile.com

86 ms

areasnap.com

areasnap.com

5994 ms

master-ResetCSS.css

master-ResetCSS.css

87 ms

master-GlobalResults.css

master-GlobalResults.css

84 ms

Accessibility Review

liveprofile.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

liveprofile.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

liveprofile.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liveprofile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Liveprofile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

liveprofile.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Live Profile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: