6.1 sec in total
703 ms
4.7 sec
752 ms
Click here to check amazing Lives content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lives.one
Get started with Global LivesOne Coin: find a wallet, buy LVT, read LVT news, and read the latest news of Digital Currency.
Visit lives.oneWe analyzed Lives.one page load time and found that the first response time was 703 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
lives.one performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value3.9 s
54/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
703 ms
1091 ms
770 ms
816 ms
844 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Lives.one, 71% (34 requests) were made to Www-static.livesone.net and 10% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lives.one.
Page size can be reduced by 197.1 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
888.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lives.one main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 955.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lives needs image optimization as it can save up to 160.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lives.one needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (37%)
46
29
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lives.one
703 ms
lives.one
1091 ms
pintuer.css
770 ms
header.css
816 ms
index.css
844 ms
index_en.css
846 ms
respond.js
849 ms
js
35 ms
jquery.js
924 ms
pintuer.js
864 ms
jquery.SuperSlide.2.1.1.js
912 ms
jquery.cookie.js
917 ms
stat_yy.js
918 ms
stat.js
919 ms
lib.js
914 ms
index.js
964 ms
5acf12d1504d9.jpg
1446 ms
bg.jpg
352 ms
logo1.png
142 ms
hot.gif
140 ms
client_icon.png
141 ms
xjp.jpg
143 ms
Maxthon@2x.png
181 ms
download.png
218 ms
bitelf@2x.png
217 ms
LivesOne@2x.png
215 ms
community@2x.png
220 ms
website_img_new_1.png
254 ms
website_img_new_2.png
292 ms
website_img_new_3.png
293 ms
website_img_new_4.png
293 ms
bg_fore.jpg
298 ms
wrap_fore.png
475 ms
website_img_6_en.png
671 ms
left.png
369 ms
right.png
369 ms
bg_six.jpg
452 ms
t_logo.png
422 ms
5a4b41c2467c5.jpg
1795 ms
5a30d3460776d.jpg
1153 ms
5a30d35e85d87.jpg
1978 ms
js
41 ms
js
94 ms
js
71 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
js
104 ms
collect
61 ms
collect
66 ms
lives.one accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lives.one best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lives.one SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lives.one can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Chinese language. Our system also found out that Lives.one main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lives.one
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lives. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: