1.9 sec in total
39 ms
1.3 sec
514 ms
Click here to check amazing LLT Labels content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lltlabels.com
LLT Labels offers quality thermal transfer labels, laser labels, blank shipping labels, pantone color match labels, label printers &more at cheap prices!
Visit lltlabels.comWe analyzed Lltlabels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
lltlabels.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value16,380 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value25.7 s
0/100
10%
39 ms
146 ms
77 ms
110 ms
129 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Lltlabels.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (449 ms) relates to the external source A31611.actonsoftware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 165.3 kB (15%)
1.1 MB
967.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Lltlabels.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 724.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LLT Labels images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lltlabels.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.0 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (59%)
63
26
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LLT Labels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lltlabels.com
39 ms
www.lltlabels.com
146 ms
j.php
77 ms
gtm.js
110 ms
bat.js
129 ms
all.css
74 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
102 ms
api.js
134 ms
181186.js
133 ms
jquery.min.js
129 ms
jRespond.min.js
128 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
128 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
127 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
126 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
126 ms
jquery.rating.pack.js
123 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
136 ms
parsley.js
135 ms
parsley.extend.js
127 ms
parsleyConditions.min.js
136 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
134 ms
select2.full.min.js
136 ms
share42.js
135 ms
jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js
149 ms
main.js
235 ms
onveos-ajax.js
149 ms
responsive.js
150 ms
swap.js
124 ms
AjaxPager.js
149 ms
v.gif
35 ms
jquery.rating.css
173 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
168 ms
owl.combined.css
167 ms
select2.css
169 ms
optimize.js
120 ms
js
42 ms
26021578.js
101 ms
analytics.js
117 ms
31611
449 ms
recaptcha__en.js
179 ms
image
248 ms
image
254 ms
image
250 ms
image
247 ms
image
246 ms
image
248 ms
image
255 ms
image
253 ms
form-bg-opt.jpg
256 ms
cc-icons.png
255 ms
26021578
250 ms
seal.min.js
404 ms
collect
99 ms
khand-regular-webfont.svg
70 ms
khand-light-webfont.svg
147 ms
khand-bold-webfont.svg
148 ms
khand-semibold-webfont.svg
147 ms
khand-medium-webfont.svg
147 ms
biryani-ultralight-webfont.svg
146 ms
collect
174 ms
clarity.js
81 ms
safe-standard.js
133 ms
owl-next.png
84 ms
next.png
83 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
275 ms
c.gif
38 ms
lltlabels.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lltlabels.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lltlabels.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lltlabels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lltlabels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lltlabels.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LLT Labels. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: