19.8 sec in total
3.8 sec
15.8 sec
235 ms
Welcome to logix.in homepage info - get ready to check Logix best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about logix.in
Logix InfoSecurity has a team off IT and cyber security experts. Our eShop has security solutions for mailing, DMARC, BIMI, and UTM.
Visit logix.inWe analyzed Logix.in page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 16 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
logix.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.9 s
0/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value34.5 s
0/100
10%
Value3,850 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value32.7 s
0/100
10%
3832 ms
12 ms
543 ms
803 ms
1977 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Logix.in, 12% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Logix.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (44%)
2.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Logix.in main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 478.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Logix needs image optimization as it can save up to 478.0 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 350.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 350.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 349.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Logix.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 349.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (74%)
78
20
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Logix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.logix.in
3832 ms
font-awesome.min.css
12 ms
basic.css
543 ms
headers.css
803 ms
bootstrap.css
1977 ms
shortcodes.css
1468 ms
flexslider.css
1085 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1118 ms
style.css
1453 ms
skeleton.css
1130 ms
responsive.css
1674 ms
styles.css
1434 ms
resume-styles.css
1432 ms
custom_script.css
2713 ms
page-list.css
1438 ms
jquery.js
1786 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1482 ms
jquery.multi-file.js
1979 ms
wp-google-analytics.js
1712 ms
easing.js
1773 ms
fitvids.js
2000 ms
js
45 ms
js-image-slider.css
2033 ms
js-image-slider.js
2070 ms
generic.css
3094 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2018 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2051 ms
scripts.js
2066 ms
shortcodes.js
2176 ms
bootstrap.js
2327 ms
superfish.js
2340 ms
mobilemenu.js
2342 ms
waypoints.js
2424 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
2629 ms
functions.js
2621 ms
prettyPhoto.js
2881 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
2703 ms
twitter.png
3580 ms
facebook.png
3580 ms
google.png
3579 ms
linkedin.png
3579 ms
xing.png
5517 ms
Logix-Corporate-Logo-420x150.png
4165 ms
sl1.png
5298 ms
Banner.jpg
5575 ms
sl2.png
5475 ms
sl3.png
7537 ms
sl4.png
6414 ms
o365.png
5666 ms
zimbralogo11.png
5746 ms
we-are-hiring-blue.png
6112 ms
ga.js
38 ms
loading.gif
5224 ms
map.png
5311 ms
feedback.js
2895 ms
widget_async.js
11 ms
__utm.gif
2854 ms
widget.js
5 ms
widget.css
10 ms
likebox.php
2927 ms
toggle.png
2446 ms
ajaxhandler.aspx
53 ms
bullet.png
2596 ms
favicon-new.png
37 ms
chat-bubbles.png
65 ms
xYm_UD1pmAz.css
44 ms
TGpOWuX6Pv8.css
52 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
65 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
91 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
90 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
89 ms
263811_207216392658210_5633484_n.jpg
32 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
9 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
9 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
10 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
15 ms
common.js
17 ms
util.js
36 ms
stats.js
35 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
276 ms
retina.css
567 ms
params
63 ms
logix.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
logix.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
logix.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Logix.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Logix.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
logix.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Logix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: