2.9 sec in total
330 ms
2.1 sec
508 ms
Welcome to lonap.net homepage info - get ready to check LONAP best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about lonap.net
LONAP Internet Exchange Point based in London, UK.
Visit lonap.netWe analyzed Lonap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
lonap.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value4.9 s
64/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
330 ms
818 ms
142 ms
215 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Lonap.net, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (818 ms) belongs to the original domain Lonap.net.
Page size can be reduced by 346.6 kB (33%)
1.0 MB
699.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Lonap.net main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 579.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LONAP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 240.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lonap.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (22%)
37
29
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LONAP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lonap.net
330 ms
www.lonap.net
818 ms
royalslider.css
142 ms
rs-default.css
215 ms
css
26 ms
main.css
443 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
301 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
478 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
324 ms
TweenMax.min.js
29 ms
plugins.js
526 ms
main.js
225 ms
lonaplogoWhite.png
172 ms
headAltTwitter.png
169 ms
headAltTwitterAlt.png
173 ms
headAltLinkedin.png
170 ms
headAltLinkedinAlt.png
171 ms
home-slide-typing.jpg
226 ms
home-slide-buildingmirror.jpg
288 ms
home-slide-speedrail.jpg
437 ms
icon-networks.png
175 ms
panel-city.jpg
295 ms
icon-lonap.png
175 ms
panel-trefor.jpg
295 ms
icon-global.png
227 ms
panel-rack.jpg
297 ms
members-logo-amazon.png
301 ms
members-logo-bbc.png
358 ms
members-logo-twitter.png
367 ms
members-logo-plusnet.png
376 ms
members-logo-microsoft.png
377 ms
members-logo-moneysupermarket.png
378 ms
members-logo-netflix.png
431 ms
members-logo-symantec.png
440 ms
members-logo-zen.png
441 ms
members-logo-claranet.png
439 ms
footerEuroIX.png
450 ms
footerRipe.png
504 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
71 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
71 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
71 ms
preloader-white.gif
345 ms
lonap.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lonap.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lonap.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lonap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lonap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lonap.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LONAP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: