3.2 sec in total
492 ms
2.4 sec
334 ms
Click here to check amazing London Calligraphy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about londoncalligraphy.com
Learn Calligraphy in London at our 5* rated calligraphy courses. Taught by the UK's leading Calligrapher. Clients include Royalty and Chanel.
Visit londoncalligraphy.comWe analyzed Londoncalligraphy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
londoncalligraphy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value20.6 s
0/100
25%
Value16.8 s
0/100
10%
Value5,280 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.119
85/100
15%
Value21.3 s
1/100
10%
492 ms
105 ms
206 ms
357 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Londoncalligraphy.com, 19% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (752 ms) belongs to the original domain Londoncalligraphy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (45%)
2.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Londoncalligraphy.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 97% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. London Calligraphy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 160 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Londoncalligraphy.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (73%)
44
12
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of London Calligraphy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
londoncalligraphy.com
492 ms
dg484.css
105 ms
dg484.css
206 ms
dg484.css
357 ms
css
37 ms
dg484.css
267 ms
dg484.js
277 ms
dg484.js
281 ms
dg484.js
285 ms
api.js
39 ms
dg484.js
305 ms
dg484.js
401 ms
dnc0j.css
419 ms
js
64 ms
dg484.css
424 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
424 ms
masonry.min.js
491 ms
frontend.min.js
497 ms
swiper.min.js
497 ms
mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js
497 ms
custom.unified.js
611 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
496 ms
order-attribution.min.js
497 ms
common.js
703 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
703 ms
loader.js
22 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
611 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
703 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
702 ms
react.min.js
707 ms
index.js
752 ms
forms.js
752 ms
recaptcha__en.js
152 ms
Logo-text-only-small.png
348 ms
workshop-icon-b-SOLD-OUT-6-300x300.jpg
349 ms
Layer-29-large2.jpg
517 ms
Layer-22.jpg
454 ms
Layer-48.jpg
460 ms
London-Calligraphy-Events.jpg
467 ms
wlp_gwjKBV1pqhv23Ic.woff
82 ms
wlpygwjKBV1pqhND-ZQY-WU.woff
92 ms
modules.ttf
345 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
203 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
213 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
213 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
215 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
214 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
216 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
213 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
214 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
215 ms
022a0a4ae591496344971b75f.js
339 ms
London-Calligraphy-Fashion-Illustration-Placecards.jpg
102 ms
126086518_830563387678266_4536652685395631814_n.jpg
179 ms
London-Calligraphy-Kit-For-Beginners.jpg
182 ms
London-Calligraphy-Workshop1-1.jpg
102 ms
dg484.css
101 ms
londoncalligraphy.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
londoncalligraphy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
londoncalligraphy.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Londoncalligraphy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Londoncalligraphy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
londoncalligraphy.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of London Calligraphy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: