5.9 sec in total
1.9 sec
3.6 sec
420 ms
Visit lookingglassphoto.com now to see the best up-to-date Looking Glass Photo content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lookingglassphoto.com
<h1>The premier camera and photography store in the San Francisco Bay Area.</h1>
Visit lookingglassphoto.comWe analyzed Lookingglassphoto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lookingglassphoto.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value1,980 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
1910 ms
150 ms
155 ms
156 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Lookingglassphoto.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Lookingglassphoto.com.
Page size can be reduced by 812.6 kB (36%)
2.2 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Lookingglassphoto.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Looking Glass Photo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 438.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 438.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 249.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lookingglassphoto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 249.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (56%)
57
25
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Looking Glass Photo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lookingglassphoto.com
1910 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
150 ms
frontend_style.css
155 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
156 ms
settings.css
189 ms
css
30 ms
css
43 ms
css
51 ms
wpinstagram.css
148 ms
settings.css
171 ms
css
51 ms
genericons.css
182 ms
style.css
180 ms
jquery.js
415 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
218 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
240 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
257 ms
frontend_script.js
257 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
367 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
391 ms
lightbox.js
347 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
462 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
501 ms
font-awesome.min.css
5 ms
style.css
481 ms
bootstrap.min.css
7 ms
comment-reply.min.js
110 ms
functions.js
109 ms
wp-embed.min.js
207 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
lgproper.png
435 ms
Nikkor-Resource-Center.jpg
909 ms
Thearon-Homepage.jpg
1068 ms
Photography-Classes.jpg
1069 ms
Shira-Bezalel-05.jpg
963 ms
Nikon-D500.jpg
761 ms
mzuiko-300mm-8.jpg
867 ms
EOS-80D-top-1.jpg
1148 ms
MarioLGGallery.jpg
1494 ms
Nikkor-24-70mm-1.jpg
1376 ms
Classes_Tout.jpg
1367 ms
eds-blog.jpg
1376 ms
footer-logo.png
434 ms
facebook.png
432 ms
flickr.png
127 ms
twitter.png
430 ms
googleplus.png
128 ms
instagram.png
431 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
74 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
73 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
77 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
79 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12b8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
76 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T88DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
75 ms
UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
82 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAricDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
81 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-k8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
80 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
77 ms
collect
329 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
290 ms
linkid.js
284 ms
rlrct1.js
560 ms
lookin.js
275 ms
loader.gif
101 ms
revicons.woff
125 ms
collect
28 ms
84 ms
ep
15 ms
ecc
29 ms
pixel
17 ms
pixel
14 ms
cm
18 ms
getcookie
69 ms
ermcm
11 ms
Shira-Bezalel-05-320x200.jpg
231 ms
Thearon-Homepage-320x200.jpg
309 ms
lookingglassphoto.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lookingglassphoto.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
lookingglassphoto.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lookingglassphoto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lookingglassphoto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lookingglassphoto.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Looking Glass Photo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: