3.4 sec in total
444 ms
2.7 sec
274 ms
Visit losingweightblog.com now to see the best up-to-date Losingweightblog content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about losingweightblog.com
Pay less for domain names. Register your .com, .net and .org domains from $6.99/yr. Bulk pricing and private domain name registration options. Transfer domain names risk-free from $6.99.
Visit losingweightblog.comWe analyzed Losingweightblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 444 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
losingweightblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
444 ms
137 ms
146 ms
194 ms
228 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Losingweightblog.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Godaddy.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Sales.liveperson.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (840 ms) relates to the external source Img.godaddy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (73%)
2.8 MB
743.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Losingweightblog.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 286.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Losingweightblog needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Losingweightblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (72%)
75
21
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Losingweightblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
searchresults.aspx
444 ms
uxcore-sales.min.css
137 ms
serp_rewrite_20160223.min.css
146 ms
angular.1.2.9.2.min.js
194 ms
app_compiled_02292016.min.js
228 ms
gd_logo.png
210 ms
pro-link-logo-white.png
209 ms
pro-link-logo.png
210 ms
10
126 ms
exact
511 ms
spins
667 ms
spins
712 ms
529 ms
uxcore.en.min.js
131 ms
gtm.js
48 ms
utag.js
207 ms
tcc.combined.2.1.24.min.js
27 ms
image.aspx
840 ms
salesheader.min.js
51 ms
f29c59f3-0e2c-4531-ab63-3f03d5789ff1.js
364 ms
livechat.min.js
158 ms
live.js
246 ms
ipixel
560 ms
esfyia2vf0.js
244 ms
activityi;src=4456503;type=invmedia;cat=hmq4iifk;ord=1019914210774.0045
553 ms
hbpix
640 ms
fbevents.js
352 ms
conversion_async.js
548 ms
insight.min.js
531 ms
aquant.js
548 ms
up_loader.1.1.0.js
547 ms
oct.js
546 ms
ytc.js
544 ms
spp.pl
543 ms
airpr.js
407 ms
includemarket
736 ms
salesheader
754 ms
liveperson_20150217.min.js
169 ms
chat-window_20140205.css
229 ms
applink_FOS-16901.png
228 ms
sales-pro-sprite.png
225 ms
ajax-spinner-med.gif
222 ms
uxfont.woff
403 ms
w7.woff
518 ms
tp
310 ms
hit
451 ms
dpp_sprite_rebrand.png
347 ms
tag.js
479 ms
w8.woff
314 ms
479 ms
f29c59f3-0e2c-4531-ab63-3f03d5789ff1.js
194 ms
WRf4.js
307 ms
551 ms
600 ms
607 ms
pixel;r=1982582714;a=p-55NyECWFJDPCA;ezt=1;labels=_fp.event.Default;uh=65ce955d6ae6;fpan=1;fpa=P0-508791557-1458493930692;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458493930692;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.godaddy.com%2Fdomains%2Fsearchresults.aspx%3FdomainToCheck%3Dlosingweightblog.com;ogl=
253 ms
b.aspx
141 ms
tracking.js
271 ms
ChangeMonitor-latest.js
60 ms
.jsonp
189 ms
120 ms
210 ms
pixel
116 ms
pixel
67 ms
366738.gif
20 ms
universal_pixel.1.1.1.js
15 ms
apid
64 ms
i.match
461 ms
script_data.js
181 ms
mTag.js
70 ms
14 ms
15 ms
15 ms
11 ms
29 ms
localization.en.20.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_6f5d6c554c650354a7b6d9d2f459c8fc.js
51 ms
group_status
84 ms
open_chat.cgi
102 ms
l
42 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
32 ms
livechat-modern_7cf45543dc.ttf
27 ms
embedded.20160318100705.js
79 ms
losingweightblog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
losingweightblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
losingweightblog.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Losingweightblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Losingweightblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
losingweightblog.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Losingweightblog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: