8 sec in total
514 ms
6.8 sec
700 ms
Visit lothars-edge.com now to see the best up-to-date Lothars Edge content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lothars-edge.com
1天前 J9中国(j98836.com),九游成为2023年FIBA篮球世界杯全球战略合作伙伴,腾讯万达齐聚J9总部。J9以公平公正、竭诚心意、创新精神、开放心态的愿景,为用户提供无微不至的安全隐秘服务。
Visit lothars-edge.comWe analyzed Lothars-edge.com page load time and found that the first response time was 514 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
lothars-edge.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.272
45/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
514 ms
1555 ms
220 ms
439 ms
641 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Lothars-edge.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Zz.bdstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Sdk.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Sdk.51.la.
Page size can be reduced by 130.1 kB (8%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Lothars-edge.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.7 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lothars Edge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lothars-edge.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (47%)
58
31
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lothars Edge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lothars-edge.com
514 ms
lothars-edge.com
1555 ms
tjdm.js
220 ms
webtemplatecss.min.css
439 ms
site_impt_r.css
641 ms
ftmpl_impt_2039fabf-5b65-4fa3-aa30-47b2706d9df6.css
644 ms
page_impt_home.css
652 ms
public.css
654 ms
catePublic.css
657 ms
animate.css
676 ms
iconfont.css
1285 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1073 ms
response.min.css
869 ms
interwords_zh_CN.min.js
873 ms
handle.min.js
876 ms
libs.min.js
1131 ms
render.min.js
1085 ms
schfcrichs.min.js
1088 ms
hiddennav.js
1093 ms
rBQBG1zaKjeEZqnoAAAAAIaDhfQ3178.js
1313 ms
rBQBG1zEYY2ENWyFAAAAAMkBaKg1347.js
1313 ms
rBQBHVy9XYiELTygAAAAAEJCm9I116.css
1312 ms
rBQBHVy9VVaESgOyAAAAAMSSCKE4328.js
1324 ms
rBQBG1y9VXSEUfHiAAAAAEhaO6M8353.js
1356 ms
rBQBHVy9VWqEBf1rAAAAAJjHWt81399.js
1496 ms
rBQBG1y9VYSEEzsyAAAAACRAFyE1690.js
1499 ms
rBQBHVy9VXmEXe_9AAAAAJmuxK44181.js
1518 ms
rBQBG1y9VZSEeSUjAAAAAHwceVc8782.js
1522 ms
delighters.js
1536 ms
wow.min.js
1579 ms
public.js
1709 ms
push.js
1217 ms
js-sdk-pro.min.js
4102 ms
logo.jpg
450 ms
nsh.png
451 ms
AEy7L0MzTIW2k1aE8-8gKw.jpg
1312 ms
1071d5cf-d6fa-4ba0-9722-e0c9dcedd78b.jpg
1325 ms
dCb9BUDuSVKk1q2XZaKfeA.jpg
730 ms
77AcmqGJSYuqImEbmrKyCg.jpg
627 ms
2VhviQOnTvWVhAhM_f_4yw.png_%7Bi%7Dxaf.png
629 ms
nIA4FvfgTt6i3WhVaqP2Fw.png_%7Bi%7Dxaf.png
868 ms
4YsdEPNXQlW9hk6s6Rydhw.png_%7Bi%7Dxaf.png
843 ms
xc0MyYVWSC-y92oSOU5hcA.png_%7Bi%7Dxaf.png
844 ms
s.png
955 ms
a11.png
1055 ms
xr_abImg.png
3196 ms
abTitBg.png
1084 ms
4d2565bb-0be8-4776-9c5a-455aac62a141.png
1180 ms
91fd8062-09d5-45f4-ac36-e320ae04cd42.png
1269 ms
dc1fcbdd-6bfc-48d6-9d53-fffe77a13d86.png
1301 ms
4f4e5f41-cd84-4f95-a01e-07ee06ef4c96.jpg
1407 ms
22f99597-dc32-48d2-afda-98bd7e807f30.jpg
1483 ms
4ae6040b-2687-492d-bc8e-b3c252fdcc11.jpg
1518 ms
e3f371ce-e0a7-4300-991a-51b4b3644457.jpg
1530 ms
476168c1-b8ba-42b9-a67b-e4bf55251cda.png_%7Bi%7Dxaf.png
1543 ms
9e412155-9857-40da-b263-927978c52817.png_%7Bi%7Dxaf.png
1632 ms
d44b93d2-48a3-4e2a-a3a7-dc8b4ded8eea.png_%7Bi%7Dxaf.png
1689 ms
qrcode.png
1727 ms
0813(35455).jpg
1955 ms
font_2340746_2w5hc8ars3x.woff
1733 ms
font_2340746_a9fc8exg8nq.woff
1829 ms
iconfont.woff
2069 ms
abBg.png
1760 ms
camera.png
1783 ms
advanBg.jpg
1861 ms
font_2304431_zr1lkyosfi.woff
1930 ms
font_2340746_2w5hc8ars3x.ttf
399 ms
font_2340746_a9fc8exg8nq.ttf
323 ms
font_2304431_zr1lkyosfi.ttf
221 ms
employcode.js
225 ms
lothars-edge.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lothars-edge.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lothars-edge.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
ZH
![]()
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lothars-edge.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lothars-edge.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lothars-edge.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lothars Edge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: