1.9 sec in total
478 ms
990 ms
474 ms
Click here to check amazing Lovelifecenter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lovelifecenter.net
Visit lovelifecenter.netWe analyzed Lovelifecenter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 478 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lovelifecenter.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.2 s
0/100
10%
Value26.3 s
0/100
25%
Value20.4 s
0/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.082
94/100
15%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
478 ms
103 ms
99 ms
85 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Lovelifecenter.net, 25% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (478 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovelifecenter.net.
Page size can be reduced by 399.4 kB (75%)
532.3 kB
132.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lovelifecenter.net main page is 532.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 261.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lovelifecenter needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 157.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 157.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovelifecenter.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)
14
7
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovelifecenter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lovelifecenter.net
478 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
103 ms
style.css
99 ms
U6l3m94iGmE
85 ms
1.png
23 ms
navigation.js
77 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
77 ms
wp-embed.min.js
77 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
53 ms
www-embed-player.js
92 ms
base.js
277 ms
css
109 ms
pattern.png
274 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
155 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
165 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
55 ms
ad_status.js
56 ms
RXTgOOQ9AAtaVOHxx0IUBOlC2pU_uJZcAXPUd4HCQp8.ttf
36 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
25 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
lovelifecenter.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lovelifecenter.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lovelifecenter.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovelifecenter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lovelifecenter.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lovelifecenter.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lovelifecenter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: