Tools & Wizards About Us
lovetab.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

lovetab.net

Дженерики и попперсы - Интернет-магазин Лавтаб

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

460 ms

lovetab.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lovetab content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lovetab.net

Дженерики, попперсы, афродизиаки, аксессуары и лубриканты неизменно высокого качества по доступной цене – Интернет-магазин Лавтаб

Visit lovetab.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovetab.net page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovetab.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.17

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovetab.net

200 ms

s0.lovtab.biz

524 ms

style.css

244 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

240 ms

baloon.css

248 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lovetab.net, 96% (47 requests) were made to S0.lovtab.biz and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (755 ms) relates to the external source S0.lovtab.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

689.3 kB

After Optimization

598.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lovetab.net main page is 689.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 566.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 70.9 kB

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 71.6 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 566.3 kB
  • After minification 563.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lovetab images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 37.9 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovetab.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (35%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovetab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lovetab.net

lovetab.net

200 ms

s0.lovtab.biz

s0.lovtab.biz

524 ms

style.css

style.css

244 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

240 ms

baloon.css

baloon.css

248 ms

tinywow_change_bg_photo_55878562.220x137.jpg

tinywow_change_bg_photo_55878562.220x137.jpg

245 ms

tinywow_change_bg_photo_56673538.220x137.jpg

tinywow_change_bg_photo_56673538.220x137.jpg

250 ms

02.800x600_1.220x137.png

02.800x600_1.220x137.png

336 ms

02_2.220x137.png

02_2.220x137.png

395 ms

02_2.800x600w_2.220x137.png

02_2.800x600w_2.220x137.png

321 ms

tinywow_change_bg_photo_46077879.220x137.png

tinywow_change_bg_photo_46077879.220x137.png

321 ms

02.800x600_2.220x137.png

02.800x600_2.220x137.png

320 ms

viagra.254x186.254x186-malyi.220x137.png

viagra.254x186.254x186-malyi.220x137.png

415 ms

7sildenafil-female.100x100.220x137.png

7sildenafil-female.100x100.220x137.png

399 ms

01.800x600w.220x137.png

01.800x600w.220x137.png

401 ms

01.800x600w_1.220x137.png

01.800x600w_1.220x137.png

482 ms

716omkycycl._sy355_.220x137.jpg

716omkycycl._sy355_.220x137.jpg

420 ms

tinywow_change_bg_photo_45897500.220x137.png

tinywow_change_bg_photo_45897500.220x137.png

553 ms

levitra_1.220x137.png

levitra_1.220x137.png

479 ms

04.220x137.png

04.220x137.png

481 ms

tinywow_change_bg_photo_45905648.220x137.png

tinywow_change_bg_photo_45905648.220x137.png

496 ms

woman2.jpg

woman2.jpg

588 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

642 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

561 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

26 ms

jquery.autocomplete-min.js

jquery.autocomplete-min.js

561 ms

ctrlnavigate.js

ctrlnavigate.js

577 ms

validate.js

validate.js

630 ms

zeroclipboard.js

zeroclipboard.js

644 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

644 ms

ajax_cart.js

ajax_cart.js

659 ms

jquery.rating-2.0.js

jquery.rating-2.0.js

671 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

710 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

722 ms

allscripts.js

allscripts.js

725 ms

responsivelyLazy.min.js

responsivelyLazy.min.js

725 ms

logo_svg.svg

logo_svg.svg

742 ms

logo_footer.svg

logo_footer.svg

755 ms

reset.css

reset.css

555 ms

pattern.gif

pattern.gif

162 ms

star2.svg

star2.svg

162 ms

star.svg

star.svg

158 ms

banner-pocket-rush-1.199x285.jpg

banner-pocket-rush-1.199x285.jpg

163 ms

lovetabs%28%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B%20%D0%B2%20%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%85%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%85%29.1200x171.jpg

lovetabs%28%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B%20%D0%B2%20%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%85%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%85%29.1200x171.jpg

176 ms

lovetabbanner1-desctop.1200x171.jpg

lovetabbanner1-desctop.1200x171.jpg

177 ms

lk-bonus-12.1200x171-1.1200x171.jpg

lk-bonus-12.1200x171-1.1200x171.jpg

329 ms

ban3.1200x171-1.1200x171.jpg

ban3.1200x171-1.1200x171.jpg

175 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

157 ms

icon_search-new.png

icon_search-new.png

142 ms

Accessibility Review

lovetab.net accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lovetab.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lovetab.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovetab.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovetab.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovetab.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lovetab. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: