Tools & Wizards About Us
lovethisgiant.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lovethisgiant.com

David Byrne | Love This Giant | In Short

Page Load Speed

755 ms in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

607 ms

Page Rendered

105 ms

lovethisgiant.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Love This Giant content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lovethisgiant.com

Love This Giant developed like many a New York City-bred friendship. Both parties are kind of hazy about how it began, but after a couple of…

Visit lovethisgiant.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovethisgiant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 712 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lovethisgiant.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,230 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovethisgiant.com

43 ms

love-this-giant

206 ms

css

19 ms

style.min.css

6 ms

scripts.min.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lovethisgiant.com, 32% (8 requests) were made to Davidbyrne.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) relates to the external source Davidbyrne.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

571.2 kB

After Optimization

495.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lovethisgiant.com main page is 571.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 367.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 27.4 kB
  • After minification 17.3 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 367.4 kB
  • After minification 351.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Love This Giant images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 160.8 kB
  • After minification 160.8 kB
  • After compression 124.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 39 B

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 15.5 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovethisgiant.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (43%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Love This Giant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lovethisgiant.com

lovethisgiant.com

43 ms

love-this-giant

love-this-giant

206 ms

css

css

19 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

6 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

17 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

97 ms

logo.png

logo.png

78 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

49 ms

universalpixel.js

universalpixel.js

61 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

62 ms

LTG1_1286_780_80_c1.jpeg

LTG1_1286_780_80_c1.jpeg

47 ms

LTG2_1439_780_80_c1.jpeg

LTG2_1439_780_80_c1.jpeg

46 ms

LTG-tour-1_1440_780_80_c1.jpeg

LTG-tour-1_1440_780_80_c1.jpeg

46 ms

LTG3_1440_665_80_c1.jpeg

LTG3_1440_665_80_c1.jpeg

60 ms

font

font

60 ms

font

font

105 ms

116 ms

155 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

9 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

158 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

41 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

js

js

62 ms

15 ms

Accessibility Review

lovethisgiant.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lovethisgiant.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lovethisgiant.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovethisgiant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovethisgiant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovethisgiant.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Love This Giant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: