Tools & Wizards About Us
lovetour.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

lovetour.com

全球出境旅游_专业定制高品质境外游 海岛游 出境自由行-爱游官网

Page Load Speed

24.8 sec in total

First Response

630 ms

Resources Loaded

23.8 sec

Page Rendered

374 ms

lovetour.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lovetour.com homepage info - get ready to check Lovetour best content right away, or after learning these important things about lovetour.com

爱游是国内TOP出境自由行定制游品牌，专业提供泰国、马尔代夫、毛里求斯、巴厘岛、杜马盖地等全球出境旅行定制服务，同时为您提供7*24小时产品咨询、行程定制、行中助手等管家式服务。

Visit lovetour.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lovetour.com page load time and found that the first response time was 630 ms and then it took 24.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

lovetour.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lovetour.com

630 ms

www.lovetour.com

1796 ms

index_common.css

1438 ms

bootstrap.min.css

919 ms

common.css

1048 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Lovetour.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Dl.ntalker.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Apps.bdimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Btrail.ntalker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.6 kB (37%)

Content Size

685.2 kB

After Optimization

430.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lovetour.com main page is 685.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 344.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 66.8 kB

  • Original 79.0 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.1 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 344.2 kB
  • After minification 316.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lovetour images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 42.0 kB

  • Original 98.5 kB
  • After minification 88.0 kB
  • After compression 56.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 117.8 kB

  • Original 163.6 kB
  • After minification 159.1 kB
  • After compression 45.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovetour.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (47%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lovetour. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lovetour.com

lovetour.com

630 ms

www.lovetour.com

www.lovetour.com

1796 ms

index_common.css

index_common.css

1438 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

919 ms

common.css

common.css

1048 ms

index.css

index.css

865 ms

utils.css

utils.css

1087 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

996 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

366 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

421 ms

base.js

base.js

415 ms

watermark.min.js

watermark.min.js

730 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

448 ms

ntkfstat.js

ntkfstat.js

1316 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

507 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

507 ms

%E6%95%A2%E7%88%B1%E6%95%A2%E6%B8%B8.svg

%E6%95%A2%E7%88%B1%E6%95%A2%E6%B8%B8.svg

228 ms

%E4%B8%BA%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E9%81%B8%E6%8B%A9%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8.svg

%E4%B8%BA%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E9%81%B8%E6%8B%A9%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8.svg

207 ms

%E6%97%A0%E9%9C%80%E6%93%8D%E5%BF%83.svg

%E6%97%A0%E9%9C%80%E6%93%8D%E5%BF%83.svg

219 ms

%E6%B7%B1%E5%BA%A6%E4%BD%93%E9%AA%8C.svg

%E6%B7%B1%E5%BA%A6%E4%BD%93%E9%AA%8C.svg

231 ms

%E4%BB%B7%E6%A0%BC%E9%80%8F%E6%98%8E.svg

%E4%BB%B7%E6%A0%BC%E9%80%8F%E6%98%8E.svg

278 ms

%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%9C.svg

%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%9C.svg

372 ms

%E9%9A%8F%E6%97%B6%E5%87%BA%E5%8F%91.svg

%E9%9A%8F%E6%97%B6%E5%87%BA%E5%8F%91.svg

409 ms

%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%94%E7%9B%AE%E7%9A%84%E5%9C%B0.svg

%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%94%E7%9B%AE%E7%9A%84%E5%9C%B0.svg

466 ms

%E9%A9%AC%E5%B0%94%E4%BB%A3%E5%A4%AB.svg

%E9%A9%AC%E5%B0%94%E4%BB%A3%E5%A4%AB.svg

474 ms

%E5%B7%B4%E5%8E%98%E5%B2%9B.svg

%E5%B7%B4%E5%8E%98%E5%B2%9B.svg

461 ms

%E6%AF%9B%E9%87%8C%E6%B1%82%E6%96%AF.svg

%E6%AF%9B%E9%87%8C%E6%B1%82%E6%96%AF.svg

485 ms

%E6%99%AE%E5%90%89%E5%B2%9B.svg

%E6%99%AE%E5%90%89%E5%B2%9B.svg

574 ms

%E6%9D%9C%E9%A9%AC%E7%9B%96%E5%9C%B0.svg

%E6%9D%9C%E9%A9%AC%E7%9B%96%E5%9C%B0.svg

610 ms

%E6%82%89%E5%B0%BC.svg

%E6%82%89%E5%B0%BC.svg

644 ms

%E5%A9%9A%E7%BA%B1%E6%97%85%E6%8B%8D.svg

%E5%A9%9A%E7%BA%B1%E6%97%85%E6%8B%8D.svg

644 ms

%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8%E5%AE%A2%E6%9C%89%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%B4.svg

%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8%E5%AE%A2%E6%9C%89%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%B4.svg

667 ms

%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%94%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81.svg

%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%94%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81.svg

680 ms

%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8%E9%87%91%E7%89%8C%E6%97%85%E8%A1%8C%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%B8%88.svg

%E7%88%B1%E6%B8%B8%E9%87%91%E7%89%8C%E6%97%85%E8%A1%8C%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%B8%88.svg

761 ms

0727logo.png

0727logo.png

792 ms

call.png

call.png

833 ms

call-black.png

call-black.png

832 ms

rn2.png

rn2.png

869 ms

product-bg.jpg

product-bg.jpg

2716 ms

diag_logo.png

diag_logo.png

980 ms

call_logo.png

call_logo.png

997 ms

wechat_logo.png

wechat_logo.png

1055 ms

wechat_overlay.png

wechat_overlay.png

1043 ms

call_overlay.png

call_overlay.png

1093 ms

play.png

play.png

1162 ms

bottom_min.png

bottom_min.png

1202 ms

%E5%AE%A2%E4%BA%BA%E6%99%92%E5%9B%BE.svg

%E5%AE%A2%E4%BA%BA%E6%99%92%E5%9B%BE.svg

1252 ms

webfont.woff

webfont.woff

1132 ms

DTLNOBEL-T-BOLD.woff

DTLNOBEL-T-BOLD.woff

1174 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

1222 ms

lined-icons.woff

lined-icons.woff

1262 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1169 ms

right.png

right.png

1030 ms

one-stop-icon.png

one-stop-icon.png

1054 ms

free-tailor-icon.png

free-tailor-icon.png

1111 ms

biunique-icon.png

biunique-icon.png

1140 ms

payment-icon.png

payment-icon.png

1182 ms

no-shopping-icon.png

no-shopping-icon.png

1239 ms

sidebar_inquiry.png

sidebar_inquiry.png

1268 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

241 ms

userinfo.php

userinfo.php

20008 ms

webfont.ttf

webfont.ttf

476 ms

DTLNOBEL-T-BOLD.ttf

DTLNOBEL-T-BOLD.ttf

648 ms

font-icons.ttf

font-icons.ttf

431 ms

lined-icons.ttf

lined-icons.ttf

455 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

307 ms

zh_cn.js

zh_cn.js

242 ms

chat.in.js

chat.in.js

869 ms

mqtt31.js

mqtt31.js

482 ms

mqtt.chat.js

mqtt.chat.js

486 ms

Accessibility Review

lovetour.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lovetour.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lovetour.com SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovetour.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovetour.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lovetour.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lovetour. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: