43.4 sec in total
5.7 sec
37.6 sec
208 ms
Visit lply.net now to see the best up-to-date Lply content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lply.net
lply分类目录网-04-22年记录-历史百度权重4-桔子高评分-外链超多-外链排名高
Visit lply.netWe analyzed Lply.net page load time and found that the first response time was 5.7 sec and then it took 37.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
lply.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
5663 ms
2088 ms
1195 ms
6686 ms
4068 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Lply.net, 24% (8 requests) were made to Cpro.baidustatic.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Pos.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Tajs.qq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 220.4 kB (63%)
350.4 kB
130.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lply.net main page is 350.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 262.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lply needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 170.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lply.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (43%)
30
17
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lply. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lply.net
5663 ms
www.lply.net
2088 ms
nav.css
1195 ms
jquery.js
6686 ms
common.js
4068 ms
c.js
1955 ms
stats
20323 ms
reset.css
578 ms
bg.png
2661 ms
rss_logo.png
548 ms
hli.jpg
2068 ms
qq_login.png
2803 ms
logo.png
4264 ms
select.gif
1847 ms
ipt.png
3481 ms
blue.png
6561 ms
audit.gif
3330 ms
ncsm
959 ms
dot.gif
13116 ms
fbg.png
3817 ms
ncsm
3413 ms
cpro.js
752 ms
adx.php
1879 ms
icon_12px.png
518 ms
reduce_bd-logo1_oper.png
498 ms
closefeedback.min.js
546 ms
reduce_promotion_oper.png
486 ms
bd_logo.png
503 ms
bg_rb.png
511 ms
o.htm
8082 ms
wh.js
758 ms
ac.js
538 ms
fp.htm
637 ms
lply.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
lply.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
lply.net SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lply.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lply.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lply.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lply. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: