Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

lrap.org

Enrollment Management Solutions for Higher Education

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

588 ms

lrap.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lrap.org homepage info - get ready to check Lrap best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lrap.org

Our enrollment management solutions have helped over 200 institutions make going to college more accessible for their students.

Visit lrap.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Lrap.org page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lrap.org performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value37,310 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value55.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lrap.org

16 ms

ardeoeducation.org

948 ms

css

114 ms

jquery.min.js

108 ms

bootstrap.min.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lrap.org, 72% (97 requests) were made to Ardeoeducation.org and 4% (6 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (948 ms) relates to the external source Ardeoeducation.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Lrap.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 83.1 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lrap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 45.0 kB

  • Original 437.5 kB
  • After minification 437.4 kB
  • After compression 392.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 236.3 kB
  • After minification 236.2 kB
  • After compression 227.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lrap.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (68%)

Requests Now

126

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lrap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lrap.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lrap.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lrap.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lrap.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lrap.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lrap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: