16.9 sec in total
5.2 sec
10.7 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to lrb2016.in homepage info - get ready to check Lrb 2016 best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about lrb2016.in
LRB Police Lokrakshak Recruitment Board Constable Final Result 2017, PET/PST Final Result 2017 Check Physical Test Result Merit Marks, Cut-off on www.lrb2016.org
Visit lrb2016.inWe analyzed Lrb2016.in page load time and found that the first response time was 5.2 sec and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
lrb2016.in performance score
5194 ms
483 ms
505 ms
509 ms
520 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Lrb2016.in, 27% (23 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 8% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Lrb2016.in.
Page size can be reduced by 537.5 kB (62%)
872.5 kB
335.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lrb2016.in main page is 872.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 653.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lrb 2016 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 356.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 356.9 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lrb2016.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (57%)
67
29
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lrb 2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lrb2016.in
5194 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
483 ms
simple-payments.css
505 ms
screen.min.css
509 ms
style.css
520 ms
css
36 ms
jetpack.css
526 ms
jquery.js
819 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
741 ms
adsbygoogle.js
11 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
16 ms
front.min.js
537 ms
gprofiles.js
12 ms
wpgroho.js
543 ms
small-menu.js
558 ms
wp-embed.min.js
567 ms
e-201736.js
16 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
36 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
37 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
48 ms
genericons-regular-webfont.woff
271 ms
ca-pub-1718044615539124.js
47 ms
zrt_lookup.html
45 ms
show_ads_impl.js
46 ms
ads
175 ms
osd.js
7 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
7 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
7 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf
7 ms
ads
166 ms
ads
136 ms
ads
193 ms
ads
177 ms
ads
93 ms
ads
78 ms
ads
65 ms
ads
165 ms
ads
158 ms
abg.js
43 ms
osd_listener.js
55 ms
ads
41 ms
ads
210 ms
ads
193 ms
ads
33 ms
ads
178 ms
ads
163 ms
ads
203 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
ads
33 ms
hovercard.css
13 ms
services.css
13 ms
g.gif
16 ms
ads
171 ms
collect
22 ms
Grocery_1_Apr_2017_300x250.gif
133 ms
d5qAyLYU.js
8 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
18 ms
cookie_push.html
9 ms
m_qs_click_protection.js
30 ms
usermatchredir
160 ms
9im3l02I.html
46 ms
ads
61 ms
transparent.png
47 ms
ads
159 ms
3652
137 ms
ads
181 ms
8K3Zg6NpZGSge3qWJUIO0OW0x1SCW4IXoAiImY1mvc4.js
72 ms
3652
68 ms
3652
81 ms
usermatchredir
22 ms
usermatchredir
16 ms
pixel
13 ms
pixel
444 ms
779a1942b24edd55b076fe3506e53d00.gif
70 ms
ic
80 ms
pixel
24 ms
pixel
18 ms
f9afb29b33c17cdeaef149c46d1babdb.gif
78 ms
ic
76 ms
ic
44 ms
3652
26 ms
usermatchredir
17 ms
pixel
14 ms
pixel
16 ms
ic
14 ms
1x1
9 ms
lrb2016.in SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lrb2016.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lrb2016.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lrb2016.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lrb 2016. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: