10.5 sec in total
189 ms
10.1 sec
210 ms
Click here to check amazing Lsharp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lsharp.net
L#
Visit lsharp.netWe analyzed Lsharp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
lsharp.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.218
57/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
189 ms
103 ms
201 ms
66 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lsharp.net, 27% (7 requests) were made to Joduska.me and 23% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (201 ms) relates to the external source Joduska.me.
Page size can be reduced by 217.0 kB (15%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Lsharp.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160 B or 39% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lsharp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 210.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lsharp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)
18
10
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lsharp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lsharp.net
189 ms
login
103 ms
201 ms
css
66 ms
style.css
20 ms
jquery.min.js
45 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
130 ms
api.js
62 ms
quote.js
43 ms
login.js
50 ms
recaptcha__en.js
87 ms
bannerTF.png
49 ms
blurTFb.png
37 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
86 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
95 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
106 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBiwlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf
115 ms
fallback
31 ms
fallback__ltr.css
10 ms
payload
14 ms
css
13 ms
logo_48.png
10 ms
refresh.png
16 ms
audio.png
24 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
11 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
10 ms
lsharp.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
<object> elements do not have alternate text
lsharp.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
lsharp.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lsharp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lsharp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lsharp.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lsharp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: