4.2 sec in total
224 ms
1.9 sec
2.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Lucifr content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lucifr.com
Thoughts, stories and ideas.
Visit lucifr.comWe analyzed Lucifr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lucifr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
224 ms
487 ms
353 ms
30 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Lucifr.com, 57% (21 requests) were made to Images.unsplash.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Digitalpress.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Images.unsplash.com.
Page size can be reduced by 64.0 kB (3%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Lucifr.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lucifr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 20 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 26 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lucifr.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (17%)
35
29
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lucifr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lucifr.com
224 ms
lucifr.com
487 ms
screen.css
353 ms
portal.min.js
30 ms
sodo-search.min.js
39 ms
cards.min.js
361 ms
cards.min.css
368 ms
member-attribution.min.js
29 ms
blog-cover.jpg
85 ms
photo-1537907907987-db650deb2e32
93 ms
best-inoreader-app-for-ios-2017-01-26T060855_o.jpg
44 ms
photo-1508872558182-ffc7f1b387f9
147 ms
photo-1482774590526-0ecac4966ff5
151 ms
photo-1502096472573-eaac515392c6
145 ms
photo-1493217465235-252dd9c0d632
167 ms
photo-1522251670181-320150ad6dab
152 ms
photo-1543145499-8193615267de
155 ms
photo-1542725783-60de0c3223c0
211 ms
photo-1453928582365-b6ad33cbcf64
149 ms
photo-1488190211105-8b0e65b80b4e
154 ms
photo-1484480974693-6ca0a78fb36b
152 ms
photo-1515343480029-43cdfe6b6aae
1218 ms
photo-1454269996696-bf4d98fde5da
219 ms
photo-1461749280684-dccba630e2f6
155 ms
photo-1478980236323-01c287f81aed
223 ms
photo-1464349153735-7db50ed83c84
223 ms
flatland_sublime_text_theme_o.png
52 ms
douban_workflow_1363219249_o.png
59 ms
photo-1533709752211-118fcaf03312
158 ms
photo-1506729623306-b5a934d88b53
197 ms
alfred-cover-image_o.png
13 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
14 ms
casper.js
434 ms
photo-1543536481-a7085ddc6c24
1007 ms
photo-1532356884227-66d7c0e9e4c2
150 ms
photo-1526920929362-5b26677c148c
148 ms
dpconfig.js
368 ms
lucifr.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lucifr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lucifr.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lucifr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Lucifr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lucifr.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lucifr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: