3.9 sec in total
754 ms
2.9 sec
278 ms
Visit lunchquest.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Lunchquest content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lunchquest.co.uk
Lunchquest Edinburgh - Reviews of Edinburgh's Dining Scene
Visit lunchquest.co.ukWe analyzed Lunchquest.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 754 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lunchquest.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value10,460 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.218
57/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
754 ms
70 ms
203 ms
139 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Lunchquest.co.uk, 24% (27 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (945 ms) belongs to the original domain Lunchquest.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (50%)
2.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Lunchquest.co.uk main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lunchquest images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 808.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 808.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 360.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lunchquest.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 360.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (64%)
107
39
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lunchquest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lunchquest.co.uk
754 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
aqpb-view.css
203 ms
custom-theme.css
139 ms
style.css
138 ms
dashicons.min.css
218 ms
desktop_style.css
140 ms
styles.css
137 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.css
210 ms
settings.css
211 ms
style.css
282 ms
css
27 ms
font-awesome.css
214 ms
options.css
270 ms
animate.min.css
276 ms
jquery.js
343 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
294 ms
front_end_script.js
294 ms
rainyday.js
337 ms
circles.js
335 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
408 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
403 ms
audio-player.js
368 ms
aqpb-view.js
402 ms
pmc_infinity.js
405 ms
comment-reply.min.js
444 ms
jquery.form.min.js
445 ms
scripts.js
474 ms
core.min.js
474 ms
widget.min.js
487 ms
tabs.min.js
487 ms
accordion.min.js
487 ms
progressbar.min.js
486 ms
smoothScroll.js
536 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
539 ms
retina.min.js
547 ms
jquery.parallax.js
543 ms
custom.js
543 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
492 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
478 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
479 ms
gistfile_pmc.js
483 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
484 ms
wp-embed.min.js
417 ms
ga.js
25 ms
512x512-1.png
323 ms
lunchquest.co.uk
945 ms
Top-image-logo2-1.jpg
681 ms
fblogo.png
280 ms
twitter-4096-black.png
281 ms
9add5e_a84c41391b184c4496ff9c93898ed439.png
281 ms
glossy-black-pinterest.png
322 ms
Mail.png
680 ms
embed
621 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
41 ms
__utm.gif
37 ms
all.js
270 ms
loader.gif
69 ms
small_left.png
114 ms
small_right.png
115 ms
25 ms
xd_arbiter.php
239 ms
xd_arbiter.php
678 ms
rs=ABjfnFVPZ9uu9aRwwgB8w1equuqUkK5Raw
50 ms
css
95 ms
js
116 ms
rs=ABjfnFVwLee7ilRNodS4pidryBsEUbxoyw
62 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
227 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
257 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
259 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
331 ms
rs=ABjfnFVwLee7ilRNodS4pidryBsEUbxoyw
102 ms
common.js
115 ms
map.js
139 ms
overlay.js
139 ms
22-blue-dot.png&filter=ff&scale=1.0
183 ms
util.js
183 ms
marker.js
179 ms
geocoder.js
86 ms
controls.js
85 ms
places_impl.js
137 ms
selection_2x-000.png
58 ms
gen204
51 ms
onion.js
23 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
147 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
87 ms
stats.js
86 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
158 ms
transparent.png
58 ms
mapcnt6.png
45 ms
tmapctrl4.png
26 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
56 ms
vt
55 ms
vt
55 ms
vt
69 ms
vt
74 ms
vt
77 ms
vt
75 ms
vt
71 ms
vt
92 ms
vt
97 ms
vt
160 ms
vt
160 ms
viewer-icons001.png
173 ms
star4.png
210 ms
22-blue-dot.png&scale=1.0
138 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
60 ms
MyMaps_Icons003.png
58 ms
mymaps_32.png
57 ms
v1_4593b7d7.png
68 ms
google-my-maps-logo-small-001.png
66 ms
kh
77 ms
lunchquest.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lunchquest.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lunchquest.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lunchquest.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lunchquest.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lunchquest.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lunchquest. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: