4.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.4 sec
233 ms
Visit luvfax.com now to see the best up-to-date Luvfax content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luvfax.com
DropCatch.com helps you secure expiring domain names.
Visit luvfax.comWe analyzed Luvfax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
luvfax.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value460 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
1240 ms
57 ms
68 ms
80 ms
93 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Luvfax.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Luvfax.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (51%)
2.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Luvfax.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Luvfax needs image optimization as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 822.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 822.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 330.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luvfax.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 330.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (67%)
81
27
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luvfax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.luvfax.com
1240 ms
css
57 ms
css
68 ms
css
80 ms
css
93 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
314 ms
superfish.js
203 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
199 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
258 ms
scripts.js
196 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
263 ms
extra_style.css
264 ms
grid_1170.css
350 ms
styles_v5.css
513 ms
responsive.css
385 ms
superfish.css
350 ms
camera.css
393 ms
widgets.css
377 ms
facebookfree.css
391 ms
cloud-zoom.css
395 ms
prototype.js
568 ms
ccard.js
449 ms
validation.js
526 ms
builder.js
457 ms
effects.js
557 ms
dragdrop.js
589 ms
controls.js
591 ms
slider.js
589 ms
js.js
590 ms
form.js
622 ms
translate.js
631 ms
cookies.js
642 ms
cloud-zoom.1.0.2.min.js
643 ms
iwd-jquery-2.1.3.min.js
770 ms
modal.js
648 ms
bootstrap.js
811 ms
msrp.js
697 ms
colorbox.css
663 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
665 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
737 ms
seal.js
162 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
713 ms
ga.js
29 ms
main-background.png
101 ms
luvfax-logo.png
140 ms
login-lock-img.png
99 ms
btn-back.png
100 ms
login-arrow.png
96 ms
searchforaperson.jpg
98 ms
search.jpg
136 ms
slider-img1.png
406 ms
slider-img2.png
343 ms
slider-img3.png
281 ms
slider-img4.png
466 ms
footer_icon.png
277 ms
laptop.jpg
324 ms
prev_bttn.jpg
263 ms
next_bttn.jpg
330 ms
digicert_icon.jpg
332 ms
authorizenet_logo.jpg
391 ms
seal_image.php
160 ms
__utm.gif
51 ms
fb_icon.jpg
366 ms
utube_icon.jpg
373 ms
twitter_icon.jpg
373 ms
v_icon.jpg
430 ms
ftrmaing.png
425 ms
footer-center-back.png
424 ms
all.js
297 ms
border.png
395 ms
controls.png
395 ms
71620787
31 ms
player.js
95 ms
player.css
82 ms
vuid.min.js
76 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
proxy.html
54 ms
491356783.webp
142 ms
56 ms
xd_arbiter.php
380 ms
print.css
68 ms
xd_arbiter.php
243 ms
luvfax.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
luvfax.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
luvfax.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luvfax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Luvfax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
luvfax.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Luvfax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: