4.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.9 sec
135 ms
Click here to check amazing Lvstek content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lvstek.com
Leader's of disruptive low vision and blind assistive technology solutions with a sole focus on increaseing greater independence.
Visit lvstek.comWe analyzed Lvstek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lvstek.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.5 s
0/100
10%
Value18.9 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
1080 ms
88 ms
115 ms
188 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Lvstek.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Lvstek.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (80%)
2.5 MB
499.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Lvstek.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lvstek needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 776.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 776.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lvstek.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (90%)
48
5
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lvstek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lvstek.com
1080 ms
js
88 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
115 ms
layerslider.css
188 ms
thegem-preloader.css
192 ms
thegem-reset.css
203 ms
thegem-grid.css
203 ms
style.css
623 ms
thegem-header.css
265 ms
thegem-widgets.css
315 ms
thegem-new-css.css
383 ms
thegem-perevazka-css.css
334 ms
css
43 ms
custom-NWV3rDil.css
464 ms
js_composer.min.css
660 ms
thegem-additional-blog-1.css
381 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
402 ms
thegem-vc_elements.css
449 ms
style.min.css
511 ms
styles.css
478 ms
thegem-js_composer_columns.css
516 ms
thegem-settings-init.js
533 ms
jquery.min.js
743 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
577 ms
layerslider.utils.js
645 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
742 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
643 ms
thegem-fullwidth-loader.js
809 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
809 ms
rbtools.min.js
810 ms
rs6.min.js
811 ms
zilla-likes.js
811 ms
css
22 ms
rs6.css
776 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
801 ms
thegem-menu_init.js
802 ms
svg4everybody.js
802 ms
thegem-form-elements.js
802 ms
jquery.easing.js
803 ms
thegem-header.js
803 ms
functions.js
730 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
708 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
706 ms
jquery.fancybox-init.js
694 ms
scripts.js
694 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
582 ms
LVS-Tek-Master-Logo-White-2020.svg
90 ms
dummy.png
92 ms
LVS-Tek-Logo-Black-web.png
108 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3aP6TimDc.ttf
51 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zAkB1p_8E.ttf
85 ms
thegem-icons.woff
108 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
54 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
55 ms
lvstek.com accessibility score
lvstek.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lvstek.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lvstek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lvstek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lvstek.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lvstek. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: