Tools & Wizards About Us
lypha.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

lypha.com

Cheap Web Hosting, Reseller Web Hosting, Domain Web Hosting, Web Hosting Provider, Budget Web Hosting, PHP Hosting

Page Load Speed

768 ms in total

First Response

78 ms

Resources Loaded

516 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

lypha.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lypha content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lypha.com

Award Winning Service with Huge Storage and Bandwidth Plans. Just $3.95/mo. PHP/mySQL, CGI, Perl, SSH. Resellers Welcome!

Visit lypha.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lypha.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 690 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lypha.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lypha.com

78 ms

www.lypha.com

126 ms

indextools.js

56 ms

style.css

80 ms

1_pic_2.jpg

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Lypha.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (126 ms) belongs to the original domain Lypha.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.4 kB (37%)

Content Size

73.5 kB

After Optimization

46.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lypha.com main page is 73.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 12.4 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lypha images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 12.3 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lypha.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (63%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lypha. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lypha.com

lypha.com

78 ms

www.lypha.com

www.lypha.com

126 ms

indextools.js

indextools.js

56 ms

style.css

style.css

80 ms

1_pic_2.jpg

1_pic_2.jpg

55 ms

1_pic_3.jpg

1_pic_3.jpg

40 ms

1_h_1.gif

1_h_1.gif

46 ms

more.gif

more.gif

51 ms

start.gif

start.gif

50 ms

pricelogo.gif

pricelogo.gif

60 ms

more_awards.gif

more_awards.gif

52 ms

see-more.gif

see-more.gif

53 ms

client-assistance.gif

client-assistance.gif

122 ms

ga.js

ga.js

46 ms

side_top_1.gif

side_top_1.gif

42 ms

side_bot_1.gif

side_bot_1.gif

103 ms

side_left_1.gif

side_left_1.gif

102 ms

side_right_1.gif

side_right_1.gif

103 ms

left_top_1.gif

left_top_1.gif

104 ms

right_top_1.gif

right_top_1.gif

104 ms

left_bot_1.gif

left_bot_1.gif

105 ms

right_bot_1.gif

right_bot_1.gif

105 ms

arr.gif

arr.gif

105 ms

side_top_2.gif

side_top_2.gif

105 ms

side_bot_2.gif

side_bot_2.gif

107 ms

side_left_2.gif

side_left_2.gif

107 ms

side_right_2.gif

side_right_2.gif

108 ms

left_top_2.gif

left_top_2.gif

108 ms

right_top_2.gif

right_top_2.gif

108 ms

left_bot_2.gif

left_bot_2.gif

108 ms

right_bot_2.gif

right_bot_2.gif

109 ms

side_left_3.gif

side_left_3.gif

110 ms

left_bot_3.gif

left_bot_3.gif

110 ms

1_pic_4.jpg

1_pic_4.jpg

118 ms

arr_1.gif

arr_1.gif

109 ms

side_top.gif

side_top.gif

111 ms

left_top.gif

left_top.gif

110 ms

right_top.gif

right_top.gif

111 ms

right_bot.gif

right_bot.gif

112 ms

bg_h.gif

bg_h.gif

114 ms

bg_h_left.gif

bg_h_left.gif

116 ms

bg_h_right.gif

bg_h_right.gif

110 ms

bg_li.gif

bg_li.gif

107 ms

bull.gif

bull.gif

103 ms

side_4.gif

side_4.gif

104 ms

side_top_4.gif

side_top_4.gif

104 ms

side_bot_4.gif

side_bot_4.gif

101 ms

bg_h_1.gif

bg_h_1.gif

103 ms

1_pic_6.gif

1_pic_6.gif

97 ms

bg_h_2.gif

bg_h_2.gif

99 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

25 ms

Accessibility Review

lypha.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

lypha.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lypha.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lypha.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lypha.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

lypha.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lypha. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: